Cited by 45Phagocytosis and Immune RegulationImmune cells in cancerAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases

Macrophage heterogeneity and efferocytosis: Beyond the M1/M2 dichotomy

Open access
Kumar Jha, Prabhash, Aikawa, Masanori, Aikawa, Elena·2024·Circulation Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.123.324011

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the liver, single-cell technologies have revealed a far more intricate landscape of coexisting, specialized macrophage subsets beyond the M1/M2 binary classification.

    “This is particularly evident in the liver, where single-cell technologies have revealed a far more intricate landscape of coexisting, specialized subsets beyond this binary classification (12, 13).”

    From Macrophage duality in liver diseases: heterogeneity, plasticity, and the quest for precision therapeutics (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The main text (page not provided) says single-cell technologies have revealed macrophage heterogeneity beyond the M1/M2 dichotomy. Its examples concern human atherosclerotic plaques and activated primary human macrophages, not the liver; the liver-specific part of the claim is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The traditional M1/M2 polarization framework is an oversimplification that fails to capture the full spectrum of macrophage phenotypes observed in vivo.

    “While the traditional M1/M2 polarization framework has been invaluable for conceptualizing macrophage functional duality, it is increasingly recognized as an oversimplification that fails to capture the full spectrum of phenotypes observed in vivo.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar Jha, P., Aikawa, M., & Aikawa, E.
Affiliations
  • Center for Excellence in Vascular Biology (P.K.J., M.A., E.A.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Aikawa, Elena
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2024-01-19
Volume
134
Issue
2
Pages
186-188
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W4390967697
Cited by
45
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL126901, R01HL149302, R01HL136431, R01HL147095, R01HL141917, OT2HL161847)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
macrophage heterogeneity, efferocytosis, macrophage polarization, macrophage function
MeSH terms
Efferocytosis, Humans, Inflammation, Macrophages, Phagocytosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review