The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reduced Number of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells Predicts Future Cardiovascular Events: Proof of Concept for the Clinical Importance of Endogenous Vascular Repair
Abstract
Background— The maintenance of endothelial integrity plays a critical role in preventing atherosclerotic disease progression. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were experimentally shown to incorporate into sites of neovascularization and home to sites of endothelial denudation. Circulating EPCs may thus provide an endogenous repair mechanism to counteract ongoing risk factor–induced endothelial injury and to replace dysfunctional endothelium. Methods and Results— In 120 individuals (43 control subjects, 44 patients with stable coronary artery disease, and 33 patients with acute coronary syndromes), circulating EPCs were defined by the surface markers CD34 + KDR + and analyzed by flow cytometry. Cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, PTCA, CABG, or ischemic stroke) served as outcome variables over a median follow-up period of 10 months. Patients suffering from cardiovascular events had significantly lower numbers of EPCs ( P <0.05). Reduced numbers of EPCs were associated with a significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular events by Kaplan-Meier analysis ( P =0.0009). By multivariate analysis, reduced EPC levels were a significant, independent predictor of poor prognosis, even after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and disease activity (hazard ratio, 3.9; P <0.05). Conclusions— Reduced levels of circulating EPCs independently predict atherosclerotic disease progression, thus supporting an important role for endogenous vascular repair to modulate the clinical course of coronary artery disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease
Ross, R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400207 · Cited by 21,725
Isolation of Putative Progenitor Endothelial Cells for Angiogenesis
Asahara, T., Murohara, T., Sullivan, A., Silver, M., van der Zee, R., Li, T., Witzenbichler, B., Schatteman, G., & Isner, J. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5302.964 · Cited by 8,725
Inflammation and Atherosclerosis
Libby, P., Ridker, P. M., & Maseri, A. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc0902.104353 · Cited by 7,724
Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk
Hill, J. M., Zalos, G., Halcox, J. P. J., Schenke, W. H., Waclawiw, M. A., Quyyumi, A. A., & Finkel, T. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022287 · Cited by 3,423
Prognostic Value of Coronary Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction
Halcox, J. P. J., Schenke, W. H., Zalos, G., Mincemoyer, R., Prasad, A., Waclawiw, M. A., Nour, K. R. A., & Quyyumi, A. A. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000025404.78001.d8 · Cited by 1,385
Cited by
Fadini, G. P., Coracina, A., Baesso, I., Agostini, C., Tiengo, A., Avogaro, A., & Vigili de Kreutzenberg, S. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000236064.19293.79 · Cited by 205
Thijssen, D. H. J., Vos, J. B., Verseyden, C., Van Zonneveld, A. J., Smits, P., Sweep, F. C. G. J., Hopman, M. T. E., & De Boer, H. C. (2006) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00242.x · Cited by 156
The clinical significance of endothelial dysfunction
Landmesser, U., & Drexler, H. (2005) · Current Opinion in Cardiology · doi:10.1097/01.hco.0000179821.11071.79 · Cited by 142
Kuki, S., Imanishi, T., Kobayashi, K., Matsuo, Y., Obana, M., & Akasaka, T. (2006) · Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/circj.70.1076 · Cited by 137
Chu, K., Jung, K.-H., Lee, S.-T., Park, H.-K., Sinn, D.-I., Kim, J.-M., Kim, D.-H., Kim, J.-H., Kim, S.-J., Song, E.-C., et al. (2008) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.499236 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt-Lucke, C., Rössig, L., Fichtlscherer, S., Vasa, M., Britten, M., Kämper, U., Dimmeler, S., & Zeiher, A. M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2005-06-07
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2981-2987
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2085350659
- Cited by
- 1,067
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 30.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.