Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inhibition of Toll-like Receptor 4 With Eritoran Attenuates Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Shimamoto, Akira, Chong, Albert J., Yada, Masaki, Shomura, Shin, Takayama, Hiroo, Fleisig, Ani J., Agnew, Matthew L., Hampton, Craig R., Rothnie, Christine L., Spring, Denise J., Pohlman, Timothy H., Shimpo, Hideto, Verrier, Edward D.·2006·Circulation

Abstract

Background— We previously reported that the functional mutation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in C3H/HeJ mice subjected to myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (MI/R) injury resulted in an attenuation of myocardial infarction size. To investigate the ligand-activating TLR4 during MI/R injury, we evaluated the effect of eritoran, a specific TLR4 antagonist, on MI/R injury, with the goal of defining better therapeutic options for MI/R injury. Methods and Results— C57BL/6 mice received eritoran (5 mg/kg) intravenously 10 minutes before 30 minutes of in situ of transient occlusion of the left anterior descending artery, followed by 120 minutes of reperfusion. Infarct size was measured using triphenyltetrazoliumchloride staining. A c-Jun NH 2 -terminal kinase (JNK) activation was determined by Western blotting, nuclear factor (NF)-κB activity was detected by gel-shift assay, and cytokine expression was measured by ribonuclease protection assay. Mice treated with eritoran developed significantly smaller infarcts when compared with mice treated with vehicle alone (21.0±6.4% versus 30.9±13.9%; P =0.041). Eritoran pretreatment resulted in a reduction in JNK phosphorylation (eritoran versus vehicle: 3.98±0.81 versus 7.01±2.21-fold increase; P =0.020), less nuclear NF-κB translocation (2.70±0.35 versus 7.75±0.60-fold increase; P =0.00007), and a decrease in cytokine expression ( P <0.05). Conclusions— We conclude that inhibition of TLR4 with eritoran in an in situ murine model significantly reduces MI/R injury and markers of an inflammatory response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.105.000901

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Shimamoto, A., Chong, A. J., Yada, M., Shomura, S., Takayama, H., Fleisig, A. J., Agnew, M. L., Hampton, C. R., Rothnie, C. L., Spring, D. J., Pohlman, T. H., Shimpo, H., & Verrier, E. D.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2006-07-04
Volume
114
Issue
1_supplement
Pages
I270-4
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2114041096
Cited by
284
References
0
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of Toll-like Receptor 4 With Eritoran Attenuates Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.000901
The paper
Shimamoto, A., Chong, A. J., Yada, M., Shomura, S., Takayama, H., Fleisig, A. J., Agnew, M. L., Hampton, C. R., Rothnie, C. L., Spring, D. J., Pohlman, T. H., Shimpo, H., & Verrier, E. D. (2006). Inhibition of Toll-like Receptor 4 With Eritoran Attenuates Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.000901

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.