Cited by 172Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart rate and cardiovascular health

Effect of High-Dose Atorvastatin on Hospitalizations for Heart Failure: Subgroup Analysis of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) Study

Open access
Khush, Kiran K., Waters, David D., Bittner, Vera, Deedwania, Prakash C., Kastelein, John J.P., Lewis, Sandra J., Wenger, Nanette K.·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Statins reduce the rate of major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients, but their potential benefit as treatment for heart failure (HF) is less clear. Methods and Results— Patients (n=10 001) with stable coronary disease were randomized to treatment with atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg/d and followed up for a median of 4.9 years. A history of HF was present in 7.8% of patients. A known ejection fraction <30% and advanced HF were exclusion criteria for the study. A predefined secondary end point of the study was hospitalization for HF. The incidence of hospitalization for HF was 2.4% in the 80-mg arm and 3.3% in the 10-mg arm (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.94; P =0.0116). The treatment effect of the higher dose was more marked in patients with a history of HF: 17.3% versus 10.6% in the 10- and 80-mg arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 0.88; P =0.009). Among patients without a history of HF, the rates of hospitalization for HF were much lower: 1.8% in the 80-mg group and 2.0% in the 10-mg group (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 1.16; P =0.34). Only one third of patients hospitalized for HF had evidence of preceding angina or myocardial infarction during the study period. Blood pressure was almost identical during follow-up in the treatment groups. Conclusions— Compared with a lower dose, intensive treatment with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease significantly reduces hospitalizations for HF. In a post hoc analysis, this benefit was observed only in patients with a history of HF. The mechanism accounting for this benefit is unlikely to be due primarily to a reduction in interim coronary events or differences in blood pressure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.625574

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clinical benefit of adding ezetimibe was consistent across patient subgroups and led to reductions in total cardiovascular events, stroke, and rehospitalizations.

    “The clinical benefit of adding ezetimibe was consistent across patient subgroups [299,444] and also led to a reduction of total CV events [445], stroke [446], and rehospitalizations [447].”
  • Four key prospective RCTs found that a more intensive drug regimen reduced hospitalization due to HF by an average of 27% in patients with acute and stable CAD without previous HF.

    “The more intense approach reduced the incidence of hospitalization due to HF by an average of 27% in patients with acute and stable CAD without previous HF. 358,370-372”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [372]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khush, K. K., Waters, D. D., Bittner, V., Deedwania, P. C., Kastelein, J. J. P., Lewis, S. J., & Wenger, N. K.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-02-06
Volume
115
Issue
5
Pages
576-583
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2103918731
Cited by
172
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
30.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
atorvastatin, high-intensity statin therapy, heart failure hospitalization, stable coronary artery disease, statin dose comparison, secondary prevention, cardiovascular risk reduction
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Heptanoic Acids, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrroles, Drug Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review