Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 843

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bosentan Therapy in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Open access
Galiè, Nazzareno, Beghetti, Maurice, Gatzoulis, Michael A., Granton, John, Berger, Rolf M.F., Lauer, Andrea, Chiossi, Eleonora, Landzberg, Michael·2006·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Eisenmenger syndrome is characterized by the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension with consequent intracardiac right-to-left shunt and hypoxemia in patients with preexisting congenital heart disease. Because Eisenmenger syndrome is associated with increased endothelin expression, patients may benefit from endothelin receptor antagonism. Theoretically, interventions that have some effect on the systemic vascular bed could worsen the shunt and increase hypoxemia. Methods and Results— The Bosentan Randomized Trial of Endothelin Antagonist Therapy-5 (BREATHE-5) was a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, on systemic pulse oximetry (primary safety end point) and pulmonary vascular resistance (primary efficacy end point) in patients with World Health Organization functional class III Eisenmenger syndrome. Hemodynamics were assessed by right- and left-heart catheterization. Secondary end points included exercise capacity assessed by 6-minute walk distance, additional hemodynamic parameters, functional capacity, and safety. Fifty-four patients were randomized 2:1 to bosentan (n=37) or placebo (n=17) for 16 weeks. The placebo-corrected effect on systemic pulse oximetry was 1.0% (95% confidence interval, −0.7 to 2.8), demonstrating that bosentan did not worsen oxygen saturation. Compared with placebo, bosentan reduced pulmonary vascular resistance index (−472.0 dyne · s · cm −5 ; P =0.0383). The mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased (−5.5 mm Hg; P =0.0363), and the exercise capacity increased (53.1 m; P =0.0079). Four patients discontinued as a result of adverse events, 2 (5%) in the bosentan group and 2 (12%) in the placebo group. Conclusions— In this first placebo-controlled trial in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, bosentan was well tolerated and improved exercise capacity and hemodynamics without compromising peripheral oxygen saturation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.630715

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 843

Metadata

Authors
Galiè, N., Beghetti, M., Gatzoulis, M. A., Granton, J., Berger, R. M. F., Lauer, A., Chiossi, E., & Landzberg, M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2006-07-04
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
48-54
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2121538692
Cited by
843
References
1
FWCI
42.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bosentan Therapy in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.106.630715
The paper
Galiè, N., Beghetti, M., Gatzoulis, M. A., Granton, J., Berger, R. M. F., Lauer, A., Chiossi, E., & Landzberg, M. (2006). Bosentan Therapy in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.630715

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.