The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local Delivery of Protease-Resistant Stromal Cell Derived Factor-1 for Stem Cell Recruitment After Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
Background— Local delivery of chemotactic factors represents a novel approach to tissue regeneration. However, successful chemokine protein delivery is challenged by barriers including the rapid diffusion of chemokines and cleavage of chemokines by proteases that are activated in injured tissues. Stromal cell–derived factor-1 (SDF-1) is a well-characterized chemokine for attracting stem cells and thus a strong candidate for promoting regeneration. However, SDF-1 is cleaved by exopeptidases and matrix metalloproteinase-2, generating a neurotoxin implicated in some forms of dementia. Methods and Results— We designed a new chemokine called S-SDF-1(S4V) that is resistant to matrix metalloproteinase-2 and exopeptidase cleavage but retains chemotactic bioactivity, reducing the neurotoxic potential of native SDF-1. To deliver S-SDF-1(S4V), we expressed and purified fusion proteins to tether the chemokine to self-assembling peptides, which form nanofibers and allow local delivery. Intramyocardial delivery of S-SDF-1(S4V) after myocardial infarction recruited CXCR4 + /c-Kit + stem cells (46±7 to 119±18 cells per section) and increased capillary density (from 169±42 to 283±27 per 1 mm 2 ). Furthermore, in a randomized, blinded study of 176 rats with myocardial infarction, nanofiber delivery of the protease-resistant S-SDF-1(S4V) improved cardiac function (ejection fraction increased from 34.0±2.5% to 50.7±3.1%), whereas native SDF-1 had no beneficial effects. Conclusions— The combined advances of a new, protease-resistant SDF-1 and nanofiber-mediated delivery promoted recruitment of stem cells and improved cardiac function after myocardial infarction. These data demonstrate that driving chemotaxis of stem cells by local chemokine delivery is a promising new strategy for tissue regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chemokine-protease interactions in cancer
Van Damme, J., Struyf, S., & Opdenakker, G. (2004) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2003.10.007 · Cited by 71
Cited by
Paracrine Mechanisms in Adult Stem Cell Signaling and Therapy
Gnecchi, M., Zhang, Z., Ni, A., & Dzau, V. J. (2008) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.108.176826 · Cited by 2,027
Han, Y., Yang, J., Fang, J., Zhou, Y., Candi, E., Wang, J., Hua, D., Shao, C., & Shi, Y. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00932-0 · Cited by 720
Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Homing: Mechanisms and Strategies for Improvement
Ullah, M., Liu, D. D., & Thakor, A. S. (2019) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2019.05.004 · Cited by 549
Self-assembling materials for therapeutic delivery
Branco, M. C., & Schneider, J. P. (2009) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.018 · Cited by 462
CXCR4 antagonists: targeting the microenvironment in leukemia and other cancers
Burger, J. A., & Peled, A. (2009) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2008.299 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Segers, V. F. M., Tokunou, T., Higgins, L. J., MacGillivray, C., Gannon, J., & Lee, R. T.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2007-10-09
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1683-1692
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2087482734
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Delivery of Protease-Resistant Stromal Cell Derived Factor-1 for Stem Cell Recruitment After Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.718718
- The paper
- Segers, V. F. M., Tokunou, T., Higgins, L. J., MacGillivray, C., Gannon, J., & Lee, R. T. (2007). Local Delivery of Protease-Resistant Stromal Cell Derived Factor-1 for Stem Cell Recruitment After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.718718
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.