Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure and a Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From the Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Study (I-Preserve) Trial

Zile, Michael R., Gaasch, William H., Anand, Inder S., Haass, Markus, Little, William C., Miller, Alan B., Lopez-Sendon, Jose, Teerlink, John R., White, Michel, McMurray, John J., Komajda, Michel, McKelvie, Robert, Ptaszynska, Agata, Hetzel, Scott J., Massie, Barry M., Carson, Peter E.·2010·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The mode of death has been well characterized in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction; however, less is known about the mode of death in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). The purpose of this study was to examine the mode of death in patients with HFPEF enrolled in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Study (I-Preserve) trial and to determine whether irbesartan altered the distribution of mode of death in HFPEF. Methods and Results— All deaths were reviewed by a clinical end-point committee, and the mode of death was assigned by consensus of the members. The annual mortality rate was 5.2% in the I-Preserve trial. There were no significant differences in mortality rate between the placebo and irbesartan groups. The mode of death was cardiovascular in 60% (including 26% sudden, 14% heart failure, 5% myocardial infarction, and 9% stroke), noncardiovascular in 30%, and unknown in 10%. There were no differences in the distribution of mode-specific mortality rates between placebo and irbesartan. Conclusions— Sixty percent of the deaths in patients with HFPEF were cardiovascular, with sudden death and heart failure death being the most common. Treatment with irbesartan did not affect overall mortality or the distribution of mode-specific mortality rates. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00095238.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.109.909614

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Zile, M. R., Gaasch, W. H., Anand, I. S., Haass, M., Little, W. C., Miller, A. B., Lopez-Sendon, J., Teerlink, J. R., White, M., McMurray, J. J., Komajda, M., McKelvie, R., Ptaszynska, A., Hetzel, S. J., Massie, B. M., & Carson, P. E.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2010-03-30
Volume
121
Issue
12
Pages
1393-1405
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2100454833
Cited by
335
References
12
FWCI
20.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.