Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study of Oral Sildenafil Citrate in Treatment-Naive Children With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Open access
Barst, Robyn J., Ivy, D. Dunbar, Gaitan, Guillermo, Szatmari, Andras, Rudzinski, Andrzej, Garcia, Alberto E., Sastry, B.K.S., Pulido, Tomas, Layton, Gary R., Serdarevic-Pehar, Marjana, Wessel, David L.·2012·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Safe, effective therapy is needed for pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension. Methods and Results—: Children (n=235; weight ≥8 kg) were randomized to low-, medium-, or high-dose sildenafil or placebo orally 3 times daily for 16 weeks in the Sildenafil in Treatment-Naive Children, Aged 1–17 Years, With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (STARTS-1) study. The primary comparison was percent change from baseline in peak oxygen consumption (PV̇ o 2 ) for the 3 sildenafil doses combined versus placebo. Exercise testing was performed in 115 children able to exercise reliably; the study was powered for this population. Secondary end points (assessed in all patients) included hemodynamics and functional class. The estimated mean±SE percent change in PV̇ o 2 for the 3 doses combined versus placebo was 7.7±4.0% (95% confidence interval, −0.2% to 15.6%; P =0.056). PV̇ o 2 , functional class, and hemodynamics improved with medium and high doses versus placebo; low-dose sildenafil was ineffective. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. STARTS-1 completers could enter the STARTS-2 extension study; patients who received sildenafil in STARTS-1 continued the same dose, whereas placebo-treated patients were randomized to low-, medium-, or high-dose sildenafil. In STARTS-2 (ongoing), increased mortality was observed with higher doses. Conclusions—: Sixteen-week sildenafil monotherapy is well tolerated in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension. Percent change in PV̇ o 2 for the 3 sildenafil doses combined was only marginally significant; however, PV̇ o 2 , functional class, and hemodynamic improvements with medium and high doses suggest efficacy with these doses. Combined with STARTS-2 data, the overall profile favors the medium dose. Further investigation is warranted to determine optimal dosing based on age and weight. Clinical Trial Registration—: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00159913.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.110.016667

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Barst, R. J., Ivy, D. D., Gaitan, G., Szatmari, A., Rudzinski, A., Garcia, A. E., Sastry, B. K. S., Pulido, T., Layton, G. R., Serdarevic-Pehar, M., & Wessel, D. L.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2012-01-17
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
324-334
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2109335746
Cited by
372
References
2
FWCI
28.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study of Oral Sildenafil Citrate in Treatment-Naive Children With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.110.016667
The paper
Barst, R. J., Ivy, D. D., Gaitan, G., Szatmari, A., Rudzinski, A., Garcia, A. E., Sastry, B. K. S., Pulido, T., Layton, G. R., Serdarevic-Pehar, M., & Wessel, D. L. (2012). A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study of Oral Sildenafil Citrate in Treatment-Naive Children With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.016667

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.