Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 614

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction and Prevention: Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Heart Rhythm Society Workshop

Open access
Fishman, Glenn I., Chugh, Sumeet S., DiMarco, John P., Albert, Christine M., Anderson, Mark E., Bonow, Robert O., Buxton, Alfred E., Chen, Peng-Sheng, Estes, Mark, Jouven, Xavier, Kwong, Raymond, Lathrop, David A., Mascette, Alice M., Nerbonne, Jeanne M., O'Rourke, Brian, Page, Richard L., Roden, Dan M., Rosenbaum, David S., Sotoodehnia, Nona, Trayanova, Natalia A., Zheng, Zhi-Jie·2010·Circulation

Abstract

D espite the significant decline in coronary artery disease (CAD) mortality in the second half of the 20th century, 1 sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to claim 250 000 to 300 000 US lives annually.2 In North America and Europe the annual incidence of SCD ranges between 50 to 100 per 100 000 in the general population.[3][4][5][6] Because of the absence of emergency medical response systems in most world regions, worldwide estimates are currently not available.7 However, even in the presence of advanced first responder systems for resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the overall survival rate in a recent North American analysis was 4.6%.8 SCD can manifest as ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), pulseless electric activity (PEA), or asystole.In a significant proportion of patients, SCD can present without warning or a recognized triggering mechanism.The mean age of those affected is in the mid 60s, and at least 40% of patients will suffer SCD before the age of 65. 4 Consequently, enhancement of methodologies for prediction and prevention of SCD acquires a unique and critical importance for management of this significant public health issue.Prediction and prevention of SCD is an area of active investigation, but considerable challenges persist that limit the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of available methodologies.7,9,10 It was recognized early on that optimization of SCD risk stratification will require integration of multi-disciplinary efforts at the bench and bedside, with studies in the general population.[11][12][13] This integration has yet to be effectively accomplished.There is also increasing awareness that more investigation needs to be directed toward identification of early predictors of SCD. 14 Significant advancements have occurred for risk prediction in the inherited channelopathies [15][16][17] and other inherited conditions that predispose to SCD, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 18 but there is much to be accomplished in this regard for the more common complex phenotypes, such as SCD, among patients with CAD.Many cardiovascular treatments (eg, lipid lowering and antihypertensive agents, antiischemic interventions, and heart failure therapies) prevent or delay the progression of the cardiovascular diseases that are the most frequent cause of SCD.However, the current workshop focused specifically on risk prediction for arrhythmic death in cardiac populations rather than on the broader topics of prediction and prevention of cardiac diseases in general.Unfortunately, specific pharmacological therapies directed at the electrophysiological substrate and mechanisms that cause arrhythmias have proven disappointing when applied to high or moderate risk patients without prior documented clinical arrhythmias.The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in combination with heart failure drug therapy remains the mainstay of SCD prevention 19,20 but is likely to benefit only the small population at high risk who can be identified before an SCD event.5,21 On September 29 to 30, 2009, a working group of experts was jointly convened by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the Heart Rhythm Society to address and recommend research directions and strategies in prediction

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.110.976092

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 614

Metadata

Authors
Fishman, G. I., Chugh, S. S., DiMarco, J. P., Albert, C. M., Anderson, M. E., Bonow, R. O., Buxton, A. E., Chen, P.-S., Estes, M., Jouven, X., Kwong, R., Lathrop, D. A., Mascette, A. M., Nerbonne, J. M., O'Rourke, B., Page, R. L., Roden, D. M., Rosenbaum, D. S., Sotoodehnia, N., Trayanova, N. A., & Zheng, Z.-J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2010-11-30
Volume
122
Issue
22
Pages
2335-2348
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2076827851
Cited by
614
References
17
FWCI
18.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction and Prevention: Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Heart Rhythm Society Workshop. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.110.976092
The paper
Fishman, G. I., Chugh, S. S., DiMarco, J. P., Albert, C. M., Anderson, M. E., Bonow, R. O., Buxton, A. E., Chen, P.-S., Estes, M., Jouven, X., Kwong, R., Lathrop, D. A., Mascette, A. M., Nerbonne, J. M., O'Rourke, B., Page, R. L., Roden, D. M., Rosenbaum, D. S., Sotoodehnia, N., . . . Zheng, Z.-J. (2010). Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction and Prevention: Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Heart Rhythm Society Workshop. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.976092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.