The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship Between Vein Graft Failure and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Vein graft failure (VGF) is common after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, but its relationship with long-term clinical outcomes is unknown. In this retrospective analysis, we examined the relationship between VGF, assessed by coronary angiography 12 to 18 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and subsequent clinical outcomes. Methods and Results—: Using the Project of Ex Vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) trial database, we studied data from 1829 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and had an angiogram performed up to 18 months after surgery. The main outcome measure was death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization through 4 years after angiography. VGF occurred in 787 of 1829 patients (43%). Clinical follow-up was completed in 97% of patients with angiographic follow-up. The composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization occurred more frequently among patients who had any VGF compared with those who had none (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–2.06; P =0.008). This was due mainly to more frequent revascularization with no differences in death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.52; P =0.85) or death or myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.53; P =0.65). Conclusions—: VGF is common after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and is associated with repeat revascularization but not with death and/or myocardial infarction. Further investigations are needed to evaluate therapies and strategies for decreasing VGF to improve outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09457-3 · Cited by 6,503
(2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010746 · Cited by 6,470
Cited by
Radial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery
Gaudino, M., Benedetto, U., Fremes, S., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Sedrakyan, A., Puskas, J. D., Angelini, G. D., Buxton, B., Frati, G., Hare, D. L., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1716026 · Cited by 578
Harskamp, R. E., Lopes, R. D., Baisden, C. E., de Winter, R. J., & Alexander, J. H. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318288c38d · Cited by 370
Self-citationMechanisms, Consequences, and Prevention of Coronary Graft Failure
Gaudino, M., Antoniades, C., Benedetto, U., Deb, S., Di Franco, A., Di Giammarco, G., Fremes, S., Glineur, D., Grau, J., He, G.-W., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.027597 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopes, R. D., Mehta, R. H., Hafley, G. E., Williams, J. B., Mack, M. J., Peterson, E. D., Allen, K. B., Harrington, R. A., Gibson, C. M., Califf, R. M., Kouchoukos, N. T., Ferguson, T. B., & Alexander, J. H.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2012-02-14
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 749-756
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2060091115
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship Between Vein Graft Failure and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.111.040311
- The paper
- Lopes, R. D., Mehta, R. H., Hafley, G. E., Williams, J. B., Mack, M. J., Peterson, E. D., Allen, K. B., Harrington, R. A., Gibson, C. M., Califf, R. M., Kouchoukos, N. T., Ferguson, T. B., & Alexander, J. H. (2012). Relationship Between Vein Graft Failure and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.040311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.