Cited by 644Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Graham, David J., Reichman, Marsha E., Wernecke, Michael, Zhang, Rongmei, Southworth, Mary Ross, Levenson, Mark, Sheu, Ting-Chang, Mott, Katrina +5 more·2015·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The comparative safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in general practice settings has not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: We formed new-user cohorts of propensity score-matched elderly patients enrolled in Medicare who initiated dabigatran or warfarin for treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation between October 2010 and December 2012. Among 134 414 patients with 37 587 person-years of follow-up, there were 2715 primary outcome events. The hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing dabigatran with warfarin (reference) were as follows: ischemic stroke, 0.80 (0.67-0.96); intracranial hemorrhage, 0.34 (0.26-0.46); major gastrointestinal bleeding, 1.28 (1.14-1.44); acute myocardial infarction, 0.92 (0.78-1.08); and death, 0.86 (0.77-0.96). In the subgroup treated with dabigatran 75 mg twice daily, there was no difference in risk compared with warfarin for any outcome except intracranial hemorrhage, in which case dabigatran risk was reduced. Most patients treated with dabigatran 75 mg twice daily appeared not to have severe renal impairment, the intended population for this dose. In the dabigatran 150-mg twice daily subgroup, the magnitude of effect for each outcome was greater than in the combined-dose analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In general practice settings, dabigatran was associated with reduced risk of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death and increased risk of major gastrointestinal hemorrhage compared with warfarin in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. These associations were most pronounced in patients treated with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, whereas the association of 75 mg twice daily with study outcomes was indistinguishable from warfarin except for a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage with dabigatran.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.114.012061

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was a non-significant numerical increase in the rate of myocardial infarction with both dabigatran doses, which has not been replicated in large post-authorization analyses.

    “There was a non-significant numerical increase in the rate of myocardial infarction with both dabigatran doses, 318,404 which has not been replicated in large post-authorization analyses.396”
  • Compared with warfarin, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeds was increased for dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily, and edoxaban 60 mg once daily.

    “Compared with warfarin, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeds was increased for dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, 396, 490 rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily, 491 and edoxaban 60 mg once daily.321”
  • Good data are available to support the use of anticoagulants in older patients from BAFTA, the NOAC trials, and analyses in elderly Americans (Medicare).

    “Good data are available to support the use of anticoagulants in older patients from BAFTA (Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study), 362 the NOAC trials, 39 and from analyses in elderly Americans (Medicare).396”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham, D. J., Reichman, M. E., Wernecke, M., Zhang, R., Southworth, M. R., Levenson, M., Sheu, T.-C., Mott, K., Goulding, M. R., Houstoun, M., MaCurdy, T. E., Worrall, C., & Kelman, J. A.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2015-01-13
Volume
131
Issue
2
Pages
157-164
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2063976695
Cited by
644
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 133 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
78.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
dabigatran, warfarin, non-valvular atrial fibrillation, elderly patients, Medicare, direct oral anticoagulants, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, acute myocardial infarction, mortality, renal dysfunction, general practice
MeSH terms
Dabigatran, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Benzimidazoles, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Follow-Up Studies, Medicare, Hemorrhage, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Warfarin, beta-Alanine, Comorbidity, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Intracranial Hemorrhages, Stroke, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review