The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting)
Abstract
Background: No randomized study has investigated the value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in optimizing the results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study involving 240 patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes to compare OCT-guided PCI (use of OCT pre- and post-PCI; OCT-guided group) to fluoroscopy-guided PCI (angiography-guided group). The primary end point was the functional result of PCI assessed by the measure of post PCI fractional flow reserve. Secondary end points included procedural complications and type 4a periprocedural myocardial infarction. Safety was assessed by the rate of acute kidney injury. Results: OCT use led to a change in procedural strategy in 50% of the patients in the OCT-guided group. The primary end point was improved in the OCT-guided group, with a significantly higher fractional flow reserve value (0.94±0.04 versus 0.92±0.05, P =0.005) compared with the angiography-guided group. There was no significant difference in the rate of type 4a myocardial infarction (33% in the OCT-group versus 40% in the angiography-guided group, P =0.28). The rates of procedural complications (5.8%) and acute kidney injury (1.6%) were identical in each group despite longer procedure time and use of more contrast medium in the OCT-guided group. Post-PCI OCT revealed stent underexpansion in 42% of patients, stent malapposition in 32%, incomplete lesion coverage in 20%, and edge dissection in 37.5%. This led to the more frequent use of poststent overdilation in the OCT-guided group versus the angiography-guided group (43% versus 12.5%, P <0.0001) with lower residual stenosis (7.0±4.3% versus 8.7±6.3%, P =0.01). Conclusions: In patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, OCT-guided PCI is associated with higher postprocedure fractional flow reserve than PCI guided by angiography alone. OCT did not increase periprocedural complications, type 4a myocardial infarction, or acute kidney injury. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01743274.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury
Khwaja, A. (2012) · Nephron Clinical Practice · doi:10.1159/000339789 · Cited by 8,014
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions
Cutlip, D. E., Windecker, S., Mehran, R., Boam, A., Cohen, D. J., van Es, G.-A., Gabriel Steg, P., Morel, M.-A., Mauri, L., Vranckx, P., et al. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.685313 · Cited by 5,497
(2012) · Kidney International Supplements · doi:10.1038/kisup.2012.1 · Cited by 4,326
Third universal definition of myocardial infarction
Thygesen, K., Alpert, J. S., Jaffe, A. S., Simoons, M. L., Chaitman, B. R., White, H. D., the Writing Group on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, Authors/Task Force Members Chairpersons, Thygesen, K., Alpert, J. S., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184 · Cited by 3,058
Tearney, G. J., Regar, E., Akasaka, T., Adriaenssens, T., Barlis, P., Bezerra, H. G., Bouma, B., Bruining, N., Cho, J.-M., Chowdhary, S., et al. (2012) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079 · Cited by 1,874
Effect of urinary extracts from salt-loaded man on urinary sodium excretion by the rat
Brown, P. R., Koutsaimanis, K. G., & de Wardener, H. E. (1972) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.1972.62 · Cited by 1,729
Prati, F., Regar, E., Mintz, G. S., Arbustini, E., Di Mario, C., Jang, I.-K., Akasaka, T., Costa, M., Guagliumi, G., Grube, E., et al. (2010) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp433 · Cited by 880
Prati, F., Guagliumi, G., Mintz, G. S., Costa, M., Regar, E., Akasaka, T., Barlis, P., Tearney, G. J., Jang, I.-K., Arbustini, E., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs095 · Cited by 400
Self-citationPrati, F., Di Vito, L., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Occhipinti, M., La Manna, A., Tamburino, C., Burzotta, F., Trani, C., Porto, I., Ramazzotti, V., et al. (2012) · EuroIntervention · doi:10.4244/eijv8i7a125 · Cited by 381
Cited by
2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Neumann, F.-J., Sousa-Uva, M., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U., Byrne, R. A., Collet, J.-P., Falk, V., Head, S. J., et al. (2019) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 · Cited by 7,167
Self-citation2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes
Byrne, R. A., Rossello, X., Coughlan, J. J., Barbato, E., Berry, C., Chieffo, A., Claeys, M. J., Dan, G.-A., Dweck, M. R., Galbraith, M., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191 · Cited by 5,333
Self-citationCollet, J.-P., Thiele, H., Barbato, E., Barthélémy, O., Bauersachs, J., Bhatt, D. L., Dendale, P., Dorobantu, M., Edvardsen, T., Folliguet, T., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575 · Cited by 5,037
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Neumann, F.-J., Sousa-Uva, M., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U., Byrne, R. A., Collet, J.-P., Falk, V., Head, S. J., et al. (2019) · EuroIntervention · doi:10.4244/eijy19m01_01 · Cited by 1,259
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Sousa-Uva, M., Neumann, F.-J., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U., Byrne, R. A., Collet, J.-P., Falk, V., Head, S. J., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy289 · Cited by 989
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Meneveau, N., Souteyrand, G., Motreff, P., Caussin, C., Amabile, N., Ohlmann, P., Morel, O., Lefrançois, Y., Descotes-Genon, V., Silvain, J., Braik, N., Chopard, R., Chatot, M., Ecarnot, F., Tauzin, H., Van Belle, E., Belle, L., & Schiele, F.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2016-09-27
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 906-917
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2514535253
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 30.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.116.024393
- The paper
- Meneveau, N., Souteyrand, G., Motreff, P., Caussin, C., Amabile, N., Ohlmann, P., Morel, O., Lefrançois, Y., Descotes-Genon, V., Silvain, J., Braik, N., Chopard, R., Chatot, M., Ecarnot, F., Tauzin, H., Van Belle, E., Belle, L., & Schiele, F. (2016). Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.024393
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.