Cited by 92Fatty Acid Research and HealthLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Randomized Trial for Evaluation in Secondary Prevention Efficacy of Combination Therapy–Statin and Eicosapentaenoic Acid (RESPECT-EPA)

Miyauchi, Katsumi, Iwata, Hiroshi, Nishizaki, Yuji, Inoue, Teruo, Hirayama, Atsushi, Kimura, Kazuo, Ozaki, Yukio, Murohara, Toyoaki +7 more·2024·Circulation

Abstract

Background Low plasma levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) are associated with cardiovascular events. This trial aimed to assess the clinical benefits of icosapent ethyl in patients with coronary artery disease, a low EPA/arachidonic acid (AA) ratio, and statin treatment. Methods In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point study, patients with stable coronary artery disease and a low EPA/AA ratio ( Results Overall, 3884 patients were enrolled at 95 sites in Japan. Among them, 2506 patients had a low EPA/AA ratio, and 1249 and 1257 patients were randomized to the EPA and control group, respectively. The median EPA/AA ratio was 0.243 (interquartile range, 0.180-0.314) and 0.235 (interquartile range, 0.163-0.310) in the EPA and control group, respectively. Over a median period of 5 years, the primary end point occurred in 112 of 1225 patients (9.1%) and 155 of 1235 patients (12.6%) in the EPA and control group, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62-1.00]; P =0.055). Meanwhile, the secondary composite end point of coronary events in the EPA group was significantly lower (81/1225 [6.6%] versus 120/1235 [9.7%] patients; hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.97]). Adverse events did not differ between the groups, but the rate of new-onset atrial fibrillation was significantly higher in the EPA group (3.1% versus 1.6%; P =0.017). Conclusions Icosapent ethyl treatment resulted in a numerically lower risk of cardiovascular events that did not reac…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.123.065520

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RESPECT-EPA did not quite achieve a statistically significant reduction in its primary composite endpoint (HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.62-1.00]; P=0.055).

    “Although RESPECT-EPA did not quite achieve a statistically significant reduction in its primary composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62–1.00];P= 0.055) event rates were lower in the EPA group, and prespecified on-treatment analyses suggested that higher achieved EPA levels were associated with fewer cardiovascular events.”
  • In RESPECT-EPA, event rates were lower in the EPA group.

    “Although RESPECT-EPA did not quite achieve a statistically significant reduction in its primary composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62–1.00];P= 0.055) event rates were lower in the EPA group, and prespecified on-treatment analyses suggested that higher achieved EPA levels were associated with fewer cardiovascular events.”
  • The clinical benefit of EPA relates more to attained EPA concentrations than to triglyceride lowering per se.

    “These findings reinforced the hypothesis that the clinical benefit of EPA relates more to attained EPA concentrations than to triglyceride lowering per se [92].”
  • In RESPECT-EPA, prespecified on-treatment analyses suggested that higher achieved EPA levels were associated with fewer cardiovascular events.

    “Although RESPECT-EPA did not quite achieve a statistically significant reduction in its primary composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62–1.00];P= 0.055) event rates were lower in the EPA group, and prespecified on-treatment analyses suggested that higher achieved EPA levels were associated with fewer cardiovascular events.”
  • In RESPECT-EPA, the secondary endpoint was significantly reduced (0.73 [95% CI 0.55-0.97]).

    “Furthermore, the secondary endpoint was significantly reduced (0.73 [95% CI, 0.55–0.97]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyauchi, K., Iwata, H., Nishizaki, Y., Inoue, T., Hirayama, A., Kimura, K., Ozaki, Y., Murohara, T., Ueshima, K., Kuwabara, Y., Tanaka-Mizuno, S., Yanagisawa, N., Sato, T., Daida, H., & RESPECT-EPA Investigators
Affiliations
  • Juntendo University (JP)
  • Nasu Red Cross Hospital (JP)
  • Fukujuji Hospital (JP)
  • Yokohama City University Medical Center (JP)
  • Fujita Health University (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Takeda Hospital (JP)
  • Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
  • Department of Digital Health and Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan (S.T.-M.).
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2024-08-06
Volume
150
Issue
6
Pages
425-434
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W4399681552
Cited by
92
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
19.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
icosapent ethyl, eicosapentaenoic acid, statin therapy, coronary artery disease, secondary prevention, cardiovascular events, coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, sudden cardiac death, atrial fibrillation, omega-3 fatty acids, omega-6 fatty acids, n-6/n-3 ratio
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Artery Disease, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review