Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catheter Ablation in Patients With Multiple and Unstable Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction: Short Ablation Lines Guided by Reentry Circuit Isthmuses and Sinus Rhythm Mapping

Open access
Soejima, Kyoko, Suzuki, Makoto, Maisel, William H., Brunckhorst, Corinna B., Delacretaz, Etienne, Blier, Louis, Tung, Stanley, Khan, Hafiza, Stevenson, William G.·2001·Circulation

Abstract

Background — Extensive lines of radiofrequency (RF) lesions through infarct (MI) can ablate multiple and unstable ventricular tachycardias (VTs). Methods for guiding ablation that minimize unnecessary RF applications are needed. This study assesses the feasibility of guiding RF line placement by mapping to identify a reentry circuit isthmus. Methods and Results — Catheter mapping and ablation were performed in 40 patients (MI location: inferior, 28; anterior, 7; and both, 5) with an electroanatomic mapping system to measure the infarct region and ablation lines. The initial line was placed in the MI region either through a circuit isthmus identified from entrainment mapping or a target identified from pace mapping. A total of 143 VTs (42 stable, 101 unstable) were induced. An isthmus was identified in 25 patients (63%; 5 with only stable VTs, 5 with only unstable VTs, and 15 with both VTs). Inducible VTs were abolished or modified in 100% of patients when the RF line included an isthmus compared with 53% when RF had to be guided by pace mapping ( P =0.0002); those with an isthmus identified received shorter ablation lines (4.9±2.4 versus 7.4±4.3 cm total length, P =0.02). During follow-up, spontaneous VT decreased markedly regardless of whether an isthmus was identified. VT stability and number of morphologies did not influence outcome. Conclusions — A 4- to 5-cm line of RF lesions abolishes all inducible VTs in more than 50% of patients. Less ablation is required if a reentry circuit isthmus is identified even when multiple and unstable VTs are present.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc3101.093764

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Authors
Soejima, K., Suzuki, M., Maisel, W. H., Brunckhorst, C. B., Delacretaz, E., Blier, L., Tung, S., Khan, H., & Stevenson, W. G.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-08-07
Volume
104
Issue
6
Pages
664-669
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2616039959
Cited by
409
References
7
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catheter Ablation in Patients With Multiple and Unstable Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction: Short Ablation Lines Guided by Reentry Circuit Isthmuses and Sinus Rhythm Mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc3101.093764
The paper
Soejima, K., Suzuki, M., Maisel, W. H., Brunckhorst, C. B., Delacretaz, E., Blier, L., Tung, S., Khan, H., & Stevenson, W. G. (2001). Catheter Ablation in Patients With Multiple and Unstable Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction: Short Ablation Lines Guided by Reentry Circuit Isthmuses and Sinus Rhythm Mapping. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc3101.093764

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.