Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vascular dysfunction after repair of coarctation of the aorta: Impact of Early Surgery

de Divitiis, Marcello, Pilla, Carlo, Kattenhorn, Mia, Zadinello, Mariutzka, Donald, Ann, Leeson, Paul, Wallace, Sharon, Redington, Andrew, Deanfield, John E.·2001·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with repaired coarctation are at increased risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease despite successful repair. We studied the function of conduit arteries in upper and lower limbs of patients late after successful coarctation repair and its relation to age at surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and the dilatation after sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG, 25 microgram) were measured by using high-resolution ultrasound in the brachial artery in 64 coarctation patients (44 males and 20 females, aged 19+/-10 years; median age at operation 4 months) and 45 control subjects (28 males and 17 females, aged 19+/-10 years) and in the posterior tibial artery in 37 patients and 22 control subjects. Arterial stiffness was determined by pulse-wave velocity (PWV) of the brachioradial and femoral-dorsalis pedis tracts. Patients, compared with control subjects, had lower brachial FMD (7.16+/-3.4% versus 8.62+/-2.3%, respectively; P=0.02) and NTG (11.46+/-4.3% versus 13.21+/-4.6%, respectively; P=0.046) and higher brachioradial PWV (9.17+/-3.1 versus 8.06+/-1.9 m/s, respectively; P=0.05). In contrast, posterior tibial FMD, NTG, and lower limb PWV were comparable. Age (months) at the time of repair was related to brachioradial PWV (r=0.42, P=0.002) but not to brachial FMD or NTG. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with repaired aortic coarctation have impaired conduit artery function, with abnormal responses to flow and NTG, and increased vascular stiffness confined to the upper part of the body. Early repair is associated with preserved elastic properties of conduit arteries, but reduced reactivity remains.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc37t1.094900

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
de Divitiis, M., Pilla, C., Kattenhorn, M., Zadinello, M., Donald, A., Leeson, P., Wallace, S., Redington, A., & Deanfield, J. E.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-09-18
Volume
104
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
I-165-I-170
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2087254215
Cited by
287
References
24
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vascular dysfunction after repair of coarctation of the aorta: Impact of Early Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc37t1.094900
The paper
de Divitiis, M., Pilla, C., Kattenhorn, M., Zadinello, M., Donald, A., Leeson, P., Wallace, S., Redington, A., & Deanfield, J. E. (2001). Vascular dysfunction after repair of coarctation of the aorta: Impact of Early Surgery. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc37t1.094900

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.