Cited by 168Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Ethnic Differences in Patient Perceptions of Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation Therapy: The West Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Project

Lip, Gregory Y.H., Kamath, Sridhar, Jafri, Marian, Mohammed, Afzal, Bareford, David·2002·Stroke

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We hypothesized that different ethnic groups would have different levels of knowledge and perceptions of atrial fibrillation (AF) and of their antithrombotic therapy. To investigate this further, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients with documented chronic AF who were attending the anticoagulation clinic in our city center teaching hospital, serving a multiethnic population. METHODS: We surveyed 119 patients (77 male; mean age 69+/-9 years [mean+/-SD]); of these, 39 were Indo-Asian (33%), 27 Afro-Caribbean (23%), and 53 white (44%). RESULTS: Only 63% of patients in the overall study cohort were aware of their cardiac condition, with Indo-Asians and Afro-Caribbeans significantly less aware of AF compared with the white patients (P<0.001). When questioned about the perception of the severity of the underlying condition, the majority (61%) felt that AF was "not serious." A large proportion were unaware that AF predisposed to thrombosis and stroke; among the ethnic groups, Indo-Asians appeared to be the least aware of the stroke and thromboembolic associations of AF. Only 52% in the whole cohort were aware of the reason(s) for commencing their warfarin, whereas the remainder began warfarin therapy simply because their "doctor told them to." Most patients in the whole cohort were aware of warfarin being used to prevent blood clots (65%) or stroke (66%), but Indo-Asians and Afro-Caribbeans were less so. Only 45% of the study cohort believed that there was some risk associated with warfarin therapy in the form of either "bleeding" or "poisoning." Only a minority of Indo-Asians and Afro-Caribbeans with AF felt that their doctor had given them enough information about their warfarin therapy, and many from these ethnic groups felt that they were careless about taking their warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, many patients with AF possess very limited knowledge of AF as well as its consequences and therapy. In particular, our study has highlighted significant differences between different ethnic groups in terms of their knowledge of the risks, actions, and benefits of warfarin as well as of AF itself.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hs0102.101817

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Hillier S. The health and health care of ethnic minority groups. In: Scambler G, ed. Sociology as Applied to Medicine. 4th ed. London: Balliere Tindall; 1997:135-147.
  2. Gibbs CR, Lip GYH. Atrial fibrillation and ethnicity. Circulation. 1999; 21:e153.
  3. Gage BF, Cardinalli AB, Owens DK. Cost-effectiveness of preference-based antithrombotic therapy for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 1998;29:1083-1091.
  4. O'Hanrahan M, O'Malley K. Compliance with drug therapy. BMJ. 1981; 283:298 -300.
  5. Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313-2320.
  6. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn- Thomas H, Holmes-Rovner M, Barry M, Jones J. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ. 1999;319:751-754.
  7. Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O'Connor AM, Biggs J, Drake E, Yetisir E, Hart RG. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 1999;282: 737-743.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lip, G. Y. H., Kamath, S., Jafri, M., Mohammed, A., & Bareford, D.
Affiliations
Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2002-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
238-242
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W1708053152
Cited by
168
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation, warfarin, ethnic differences, patient knowledge, patient perspectives, thromboembolism, Afro-Caribbean patients, patient education, medication adherence, bleeding risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, Humans, Male, Patients, Perception, Warfarin, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review