Cited by 119Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCardiac Health and Mental Health

An international survey of physician and patient understanding, perception, and attitudes to atrial fibrillation and its contribution to cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality

Open access
Aliot, E., Breithardt, G., Brugada, J., Camm, J., Lip, G. Y. H., Vardas, P. E., Wagner, M., for the Atrial Fibrillation AWareness And Risk Education (AF AWARE) group [comprising the Atrial Fibrillation Association (AFA), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE), and the World Heart Federation (WHF)·2010·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is not always perceived as a serious health threat, but is the most common sustained arrhythmia, with a major impact on morbidity, mortality, and patient quality of life (QoL). A survey was undertaken to examine the level of understanding, perception, and attitudes of the cardiovascular risks associated with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The AF AWARE group (an international coalition of organizations with an interest in AF) conducted an international quantitative survey in 11 countries in 2009, to investigate patients' (n = 825) and cardiologists' (n = 810) perceptions of AF, preferences for communicating information on AF and burden of AF. Both patients and physicians considered AF life-threatening (55 and 43%, respectively). Physicians were more concerned about the risk of stroke and hospitalizations than patients, whereas patients were most concerned about death risk. One in four patients felt unable to explain AF and >33% were worried or fearful about their disease. Many physicians (51%) wanted more patient information with >60% viewing available information as poor/difficult to find. Hospital specialists and GPs were identified as key information sources for patients. Most patients (83%) reported symptoms, yet 75% claimed to be satisfied with AF therapies. Atrial fibrillation patients, often with associated diseases, made an average of nine visits per year to their doctors, who consider AF difficult and time consuming to manage. Patients and physicians rated the QoL impact of AF as moderate to high. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive international patient and professional information and support programme on AF is needed to improve management and consequently health outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euq109

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aliot, E., Breithardt, G., Brugada, J., Camm, J., Lip, G. Y. H., Vardas, P. E., Wagner, M., & for the Atrial Fibrillation AWareness And Risk Education (AF AWARE) group [comprising the Atrial Fibrillation Association (AFA), T. E. H. R. A. (.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospital of Heraklion (GR)
Corresponding author
Aliot, E.
Venue
Europace
Published
2010-04-26
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
626-633
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W1970394818
Cited by
119
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, patient perspectives, physician attitudes, cardiovascular risk perception, stroke risk, quality of life, patient information needs, physician-patient communication, disease burden, health information sources, patient support services
MeSH terms
Adult, Atrial Fibrillation, Canada, Cardiovascular Diseases, Communication, Europe, Health Surveys, Humans, International Cooperation, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, United States, Survival Rate, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review