The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speed-Dependent Treadmill Training in Ambulatory Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose—A new gait training strategy for patients with stroke seeks to increase walking speed through treadmill training. This study compares the effects of structured speed-dependent treadmill training (STT) (with the use of an interval paradigm to increase the treadmill speed stepwise according to principles of sport physiology) with limited progressive treadmill training (LTT) and conventional gait training (CGT) on clinical outcome measures for patients with hemiparesis. Methods—Sixty ambulatory poststroke patients were each randomly selected to receive 1 of the 3 different gait therapies: 20 subjects were treated with STT, 20 subjects were trained to walk on a treadmill with a 20% increase of belt speed over the treatment period (LTT), and 20 subjects were treated with CGT. Treatment outcomes were assessed on the basis of overground walking speed, cadence, stride length, and Functional Ambulation Category scores. Results—After a 4-week training period, the STT group scored significantly higher than the LTT and CGT groups for overground walking speed (STT versus LTT,P<0.001; STT versus CGT,P<0.001), cadence (STT versus LTT,P=0.007; STT versus CGT,P<0.001), stride length (STT versus LTT,P<0.001; STT versus CGT,P<0.001), and Functional Ambulation Category scores (STT versus LTT,P=0.007; STT versus CGT,P<0.001). Conclusions—Structured STT in poststroke patients resulted in better walking abilities than LTT or CGT. This gait training strategy provides a dynamic and integrative approach for the treatment of gait dysfunction after stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Interrater Reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of Muscle Spasticity
Bohannon, R. W., & Smith, M. B. (1987) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/67.2.206 · Cited by 5,424
Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economy and muscle power
Paavolainen, L., Häkkinen, K., Hämäläinen, I., Nummela, A., & Rusko, H. (1999) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1527 · Cited by 692
Visintin, M., Barbeau, H., Korner-Bitensky, N., & Mayo, N. E. (1998) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.29.6.1122 · Cited by 688
Dean, C. M., Richards, C. L., & Malouin, F. (2000) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/mr.2000.3839 · Cited by 666
Hesse, S., Bertelt, C., Jahnke, M. T., Schaffrin, A., Baake, P., Malezic, M., & Mauritz, K. H. (1995) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.26.6.976 · Cited by 613
Walking After Stroke. Measurement and Recovery Over the First 3 Months
Wade, D., Wood, V., Heller, A., Maggs, J., & Langton Hewer, R. (2020) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/1650197787192530 · Cited by 607
Teixeira-Salmela, L. F., Olney, S. J., Nadeau, S., & Brouwer, B. (1999) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90018-7 · Cited by 477
Influence of walking speed on gait parameters
Kirtley, C., Whittle, M. W., & Jefferson, R. J. (1985) · Journal of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0141-5425(85)90055-x · Cited by 452
Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients
Richards, C. L., Malouin, F., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Williams, J. I., Bouchard, J.-P., & Brunet, D. (1993) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90159-8 · Cited by 343
Cited by
Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60325-5 · Cited by 2,726
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203
The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?
Van Peppen, R. P., Kwakkel, G., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hendriks, H. J., Van der Wees, P. J., & Dekker, J. (2004) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215504cr843oa · Cited by 942
Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Saunders, D. H., Sanderson, M., Hayes, S., Kilrane, M., Greig, C. A., Brazzelli, M., & Mead, G. E. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003316.pub6 · Cited by 759
Patient- cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results
Riener, R., Lunenburger, L., Jezernik, S., Anderschitz, M., Colombo, G., & Dietz, V. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.848628 · Cited by 729
Metadata
- Authors
- Pohl, M., Mehrholz, J., Ritschel, C., & Rückriem, S.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 553-558
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2047317119
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 18.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speed-Dependent Treadmill Training in Ambulatory Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hs0202.102365
- The paper
- Pohl, M., Mehrholz, J., Ritschel, C., & Rückriem, S. (2002). Speed-Dependent Treadmill Training in Ambulatory Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0202.102365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
