The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elevated Uric Acid Increases Blood Pressure in the Rat by a Novel Crystal-Independent Mechanism
Abstract
An elevation in circulating serum uric acid is strongly associated with the development of hypertension and renal disease, but whether uric acid has a causal role or whether it simply indicates patients at risk for these complications remains controversial. We tested the hypothesis that uric acid may have a causal role in the development of hypertension and renal disease by examining the effects of mild hyperuricemia in rats. Mild hyperuricemia was induced in rats by providing a uricase inhibitor (oxonic acid) in the diet. Hyperuricemic rats developed elevated blood pressure after 3 weeks, whereas control rats remained normotensive. The development of hypertension was prevented by concurrent treatment with either a xanthine oxidase inhibitor (allopurinol) or a uricosuric agent (benziodarone), both of which lowered uric acid levels. Blood pressure could also be lowered by reducing uric acid levels with either allopurinol or oxonic acid withdrawal. A direct relationship was found between blood pressure and uric acid ( r =0.75, n=69), with a 10–mm Hg blood pressure increase for each 0.03-mmol/L (0.5-mg/dL) incremental rise in serum uric acid. The kidneys were devoid of urate crystals and were normal by light microscopy. However, immunohistochemical stains documented an ischemic type of injury with collagen deposition, macrophage infiltration, and an increase in tubular expression of osteopontin. Hyperuricemic rats also exhibited an increase in juxtaglomerular renin and a decrease in macula densa neuronal NO synthase. Both the renal injury and hypertension were reduced by treatment with enalapril or l -arginine. In conclusion, mild hyperuricemia causes hypertension and renal injury in the rat via a crystal-independent mechanism, with stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system and inhibition of neuronal NO synthase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pacher, P., Nivorozhkin, A., & Szabó, C. (2006) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.58.1.6 · Cited by 1,218
Johnson, R. J., Segal, M. S., Sautin, Y., Nakagawa, T., Feig, D. I., Kang, D.-H., Gersch, M. S., Benner, S., & Sánchez-Lozada, L. G. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/86.4.899 · Cited by 1,075
Self-citationRichette, P., & Bardin, T. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60883-7 · Cited by 915
Feig, D. I., Soletsky, B., & Johnson, R. J. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.8.924 · Cited by 914
Self-citationRoberts, J. M., & Gammill, H. S. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000188408.49896.c5 · Cited by 693
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazzali, M., Hughes, J., Kim, Y.-G., Jefferson, J. A., Kang, D.-H., Gordon, K. L., Lan, H. Y., Kivlighn, S., & Johnson, R. J.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1101-1106
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2123162884
- Cited by
- 1,300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elevated Uric Acid Increases Blood Pressure in the Rat by a Novel Crystal-Independent Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hy1101.092839
- The paper
- Mazzali, M., Hughes, J., Kim, Y.-G., Jefferson, J. A., Kang, D.-H., Gordon, K. L., Lan, H. Y., Kivlighn, S., & Johnson, R. J. (2001). Elevated Uric Acid Increases Blood Pressure in the Rat by a Novel Crystal-Independent Mechanism. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hy1101.092839
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.