The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006
Open accessAbstract
This study evaluate whether blood pressure management has improved in England between 2003 and 2006, using cross-sectional, nationally representative, random samples of 8834 (in 2003) and 7478 (in 2006) noninstitutionalized adults (aged ≥16 years) of mean age 46 (in 2003) and 47 (in 2006) years. Overall mean blood pressure levels in 2006 were 130.8/74.2 mm Hg in men and 124.0/72.4 mm Hg in women. Awareness of hypertension increased significantly in the overall population (from 62% in 2003% to 66% in 2006; P <0.001), the increase being significant in women (from 64% in 2003% to 71% in 2006; P <0.001) but not in men (from 60% to 62%; P =0.26). Similarly, the proportion treated had risen significantly overall (from 48% to 54%; P <0.001) and in women (from 52% to 62%; P <0.001) but not in men (from 43% to 47%; P =0.05). Control rates (<140/90 mm Hg) were higher in 2006 than in 2003 (from 22% to 28%; P <0.001) and had increased more among women than men: from 23% to 32% in women ( P <0.001) and from 21% to 24% in men ( P =0.02). Among those on treatment, control rates increased from 46% to 52% ( P <0.001; from 44% to 53% in women, P <0.001; and from 48% to 52% in men, P =0.18). The most common agents used for monotherapy have changed since 2003 and were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Where ≥2 drugs were used, the most common antihypertensive class used varied by age and ethnicity. Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension increased between 2003 and 2006, particularly in women, but opportunities for further improvement remain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hansson, L., Zanchetti, A., Carruthers, S. G., Dahlöf, B., Elmfeldt, D., Julius, S., Ménard, J., Rahn, K. H., Wedel, H., & Westerling, S. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04311-6 · Cited by 5,728
Mancia, G., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., Cifkova, R., Fagard, R., Germano, G., Grassi, G., Heagerty, A. M., Kjeldsen, S. E., Laurent, S., et al. (2007) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e3282f0580f · Cited by 1,837
Cited by
(2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,655
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Daskalopoulou, S. S., Rabi, D. M., Zarnke, K. B., Dasgupta, K., Nerenberg, K., Cloutier, L., Gelfer, M., Lamarre-Cliche, M., Milot, A., Bolli, P., et al. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.02.016 · Cited by 684
UK health performance: findings of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Murray, C. J., Richards, M. A., Newton, J. N., Fenton, K. A., Anderson, H. R., Atkinson, C., Bennett, D., Bernabé, E., Blencowe, H., Bourne, R., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60355-4 · Cited by 553
Joffres, M., Falaschetti, E., Gillespie, C., Robitaille, C., Loustalot, F., Poulter, N., McAlister, F. A., Johansen, H., Baclic, O., & Campbell, N. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003423 · Cited by 464
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Falaschetti, E., Chaudhury, M., Mindell, J., & Poulter, N.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-486
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2153780288
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.125617
- The paper
- Falaschetti, E., Chaudhury, M., Mindell, J., & Poulter, N. (2009). Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.125617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.