Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006

Open access
Falaschetti, Emanuela, Chaudhury, Moushumi, Mindell, Jennifer, Poulter, Neil·2009·Hypertension

Abstract

This study evaluate whether blood pressure management has improved in England between 2003 and 2006, using cross-sectional, nationally representative, random samples of 8834 (in 2003) and 7478 (in 2006) noninstitutionalized adults (aged ≥16 years) of mean age 46 (in 2003) and 47 (in 2006) years. Overall mean blood pressure levels in 2006 were 130.8/74.2 mm Hg in men and 124.0/72.4 mm Hg in women. Awareness of hypertension increased significantly in the overall population (from 62% in 2003% to 66% in 2006; P <0.001), the increase being significant in women (from 64% in 2003% to 71% in 2006; P <0.001) but not in men (from 60% to 62%; P =0.26). Similarly, the proportion treated had risen significantly overall (from 48% to 54%; P <0.001) and in women (from 52% to 62%; P <0.001) but not in men (from 43% to 47%; P =0.05). Control rates (<140/90 mm Hg) were higher in 2006 than in 2003 (from 22% to 28%; P <0.001) and had increased more among women than men: from 23% to 32% in women ( P <0.001) and from 21% to 24% in men ( P =0.02). Among those on treatment, control rates increased from 46% to 52% ( P <0.001; from 44% to 53% in women, P <0.001; and from 48% to 52% in men, P =0.18). The most common agents used for monotherapy have changed since 2003 and were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Where ≥2 drugs were used, the most common antihypertensive class used varied by age and ethnicity. Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension increased between 2003 and 2006, particularly in women, but opportunities for further improvement remain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.125617

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Falaschetti, E., Chaudhury, M., Mindell, J., & Poulter, N.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2009-03
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
480-486
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2153780288
Cited by
252
References
2
FWCI
18.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.125617
The paper
Falaschetti, E., Chaudhury, M., Mindell, J., & Poulter, N. (2009). Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.125617

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.