The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nighttime Home Blood Pressure and the Risk of Hypertensive Target Organ Damage
Abstract
In ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, nighttime BP has a superior ability to predict hypertensive target organ damage than awake BP. We evaluated whether nighttime BP, assessed by a home BP monitor, was associated with hypertensive target organ damage. We measured clinic BP, out-of-clinic BP including nighttime home BP, and the urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) in 854 patients who had cardiovascular risk factors. Nighttime home BP was measured at 2:00, 3:00, and 4:00 am, in addition to clinic, awake ambulatory, nighttime ambulatory, and awake home BP. Nighttime home systolic BP (SBP) was slightly higher than nighttime ambulatory SBP (difference, 2.6 mm Hg; P <0.001). Clinic ( r =0.186), awake ambulatory ( r =0.173), nighttime ambulatory ( r =0.194), awake home ( r =0.298), and nighttime home ( r =0.311) SBPs were all associated with log-transformed UACR (all P <0.001). The correlation coefficient for the relationship between nighttime home SBP and log-transformed UACR was significantly greater than that for the relationship between nighttime ambulatory SBP and log-transformed UACR ( P <0.001). The goodness of fit of the association between SBP and UACR was improved by adding nighttime home SBP to the other SBPs ( P <0.001). Nighttime home diastolic BP also improved the goodness-of-fit of the association between diastolic BP and UACR ( P =0.001). Similar findings were observed for the left ventricular mass index in the subgroup (N=594). In conclusion, nighttime home BP is slightly different from (but comparable to) nighttime ambulatory BP. The addition of nighttime home BP to other BP measures improves the association of BP with hypertensive target organ damage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and superior to that with OBP (0.23/0.19, 10 studies) [26].”
In the citing paper
“A meta-analysis of four studies found only weak correlations of home and office SBP/DBP with carotid intima--media thickness (cIMT) with no evident differences between the two BP-measuring methods [26].”
In the citing paper
“A systematic review reported similar correlations between urinary protein excretion and HBP and OBP values based on evidence from two studies [26].”
In the citing paper
“In a meta-analysis of 14 studies, echocardiographically measured left ventricular mass index (LVMI) correlated with home SBP/DBP with pooled correlation coefficients of 0.46/0.28, respectively.”
In the citing paper
“These correlations were similar to that with ABP (0.37/0.26, 9 studies)”
Citations
Cites
Lang, R. M., Bierig, M., Devereux, R. B., Flachskampf, F. A., Foster, E., Pellikka, P. A., Picard, M. H., Roman, M. J., Seward, J., Shanewise, J. S., et al. (2005) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005 · Cited by 11,318
Staessen, J. A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.6.539 · Cited by 1,592
Kario, K., Pickering, T. G., Umeda, Y., Hoshide, S., Hoshide, Y., Morinari, M., Murata, M., Kuroda, T., Schwartz, J. E., & Shimada, K. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000056521.67546.aa · Cited by 1,250
Self-citationPrognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Recordings in Patients with Treated Hypertension
Clement, D. L., De Buyzere, M. L., De Bacquer, D. A., de Leeuw, P. W., Duprez, D. A., Fagard, R. H., Gheeraert, P. J., Missault, L. H., Braun, J. J., Six, R. O., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022273 · Cited by 1,085
Sega, R., Facchetti, R., Bombelli, M., Cesana, G., Corrao, G., Grassi, G., & Mancia, G. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000160923.04524.5b · Cited by 1,009
Bobrie, G. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.11.1342 · Cited by 842
Stroke Prognosis and Abnormal Nocturnal Blood Pressure Falls in Older Hypertensives
Kario, K., Pickering, T. G., Matsuo, T., Hoshide, S., Schwartz, J. E., & Shimada, K. (2001) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hy1001.092640 · Cited by 758
Self-citationOhkubo, T., Imai, Y., Tsuji, I., Nagai, K., Kato, J., Kikuchi, N., Nishiyama, A., Aihara, A., Sekino, M., Kikuya, M., et al. (1998) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/00004872-199816070-00010 · Cited by 746
Mancia, G., Facchetti, R., Bombelli, M., Grassi, G., & Sega, R. (2006) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000215363.69793.bb · Cited by 691
Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring
Pickering, T. G., Miller, N. H., Ogedegbe, G. G., Krakoff, L. R., Artinian, N. T., & Goff, D. C. (2008) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.107.189010 · Cited by 666
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019)
Umemura, S., Arima, H., Arima, S., Asayama, K., Dohi, Y., Hirooka, Y., Horio, T., Hoshide, S., Ikeda, S., Ishimitsu, T., et al. (2019) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9 · Cited by 1,880
Self-citationKario, K., Hoshide, S., Mizuno, H., Kabutoya, T., Nishizawa, M., Yoshida, T., Abe, H., Katsuya, T., Fujita, Y., Okazaki, O., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.049730 · Cited by 324
Self-citationNocturnal Hypertension: New Technology and Evidence
Kario, K. (2018) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.10971 · Cited by 298
Self-citationManagement of Hypertension in the Digital Era
Kario, K. (2020) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.14742 · Cited by 247
Self-citationParati, G., Stergiou, G. S., Bilo, G., Kollias, A., Pengo, M., Ochoa, J. E., Agarwal, R., Asayama, K., Asmar, R., Burnier, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002922 · Cited by 178
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishikawa, J., Hoshide, S., Eguchi, K., Ishikawa, S., Shimada, K., Kario, K., & for the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study Investigators Group
- Affiliations
- Jichi Medical University (JP)
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 921-928
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2147405230
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Omron Healthcare
- Stony Brook University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- nocturnal blood pressure, home blood pressure monitoring, hypertensive target organ damage, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, left ventricular mass, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, cardiovascular risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Albuminuria, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Creatinine, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
