Cited by 298Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Nocturnal Hypertension: New Technology and Evidence

Open access
Kario, Kazuomi·2018·Hypertension

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.10971

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kario, K.
Affiliations
Jichi Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kario, Kazuomi
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2018-06
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
997-1009
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2802806041
Cited by
298
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 5
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26293192, 17H06151)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
nocturnal hypertension, blood pressure, circadian rhythm, sleep
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Hypertension, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review