Cited by 93Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

A Trial of 2 Strategies to Reduce Nocturnal Blood Pressure in Blacks With Chronic Kidney Disease

Open access
Rahman, Mahboob, Greene, Tom, Phillips, Robert A., Agodoa, Lawrence Y., Bakris, George L., Charleston, Jeanne, Contreras, Gabriel, Gabbai, Francis +12 more·2013·Hypertension

Abstract

The objective of our study was to determine the effects of 2 antihypertensive drug dose schedules (PM dose and add-on dose) on nocturnal blood pressure (BP) in comparison with usual therapy (AM dose) in blacks with hypertensive chronic kidney disease and controlled office BP. In a 3-period, crossover trial, former participants of the African American Study of Kidney Disease were assigned to receive the following 3 regimens, each lasting 6 weeks, presented in random order: AM dose (once-daily antihypertensive medications taken in the morning), PM dose (once-daily antihypertensives taken at bedtime), and add-on dose (once-daily antihypertensives taken in the morning and an additional antihypertensive medication before bedtime [diltiazem 60–120 mg, hydralazine 25 mg, or additional ramipril 5 mg]). Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed at the end of each period. The primary outcome was nocturnal systolic BP. Mean age of the study population (n=147) was 65.4 years, 64% were men, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 44.9 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 . At the end of each period, mean (SE) nocturnal systolic BP was 125.6 (1.2) mm Hg in the AM dose, 123.9 (1.2) mm Hg in the PM dose, and 123.5 (1.2) mm Hg in the add-on dose. None of the pairwise differences in nocturnal, 24-hour, and daytime systolic BP was statistically significant. Among blacks with hypertensive chronic kidney disease, neither PM (bedtime) dosing of once-daily antihypertensive nor the addition of drugs taken at bedtime significantly reduced nocturnal BP compared with morning dosing of antihypertensive medications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.112.200477

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although prior analyses of randomized clinical trials found a benefit to evening versus morning dosing of antihypertensive medications, these results have not been reproduced in subsequent trials.

    “Although prior analyses of randomized clinical trials found a benefit to evening versus morning dosing of antihypertensive medications (81,82), these results have not been reproduced in subsequent trials.”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports earlier benefits from bedtime dosing, while this trial found no statistically significant reduction in nocturnal blood pressure with PM versus morning dosing. That supports a failure to reproduce a benefit in this trial, but the paper does not establish that subsequent trials generally failed to reproduce earlier results; its findings are limited to African Americans with hypertensive chronic kidney disease. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The benefit of evening versus morning antihypertensive dosing found in prior analyses has not been reproduced in subsequent trials.

    “Although prior analyses of randomized clinical trials found a bene fi t to evening versus morning dosing of antihypertensive medications (74,75), these results have not been reproduced in subsequent trials.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Feldman HI Appel LJ Chertow GM The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study: Design and Methods J Am Soc Nephrol 2003 14 S148 S153 12819321
  2. [10]Staessen JA Thijs L Fagard R O’Brien ET Clement D de Leeuw PW Mancia G Nachev C Palatini P Parati G Tuomilehto J Webster J Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators JAMA 1999 282 539 546 10450715
  3. [25]Townsend RR Ford V Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: coming of age in nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 1996 7 2279 2287 8959618

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahman, M., Greene, T., Phillips, R. A., Agodoa, L. Y., Bakris, G. L., Charleston, J., Contreras, G., Gabbai, F., Hiremath, L., Jamerson, K., Kendrick, C., Kusek, J. W., Lash, J. P., Lea, J., Miller, E. R., Rostand, S., Toto, R., Wang, X., Wright, J. T., & Appel, L. J.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2013-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
82-88
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2062987880
Cited by
93
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000439)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000080)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
nocturnal blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, African Americans, bedtime dosing, diltiazem, hydralazine, ramipril, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Black or African American, Blood Pressure, Diltiazem, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Heart Rate, Humans, Hydralazine, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Ramipril, Cross-Over Studies, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review