Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Refractory Hypertension: Determination of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Comorbidities in a Large, Population-Based Cohort

Open access
Calhoun, David A., Booth, John N., Oparil, Suzanne, Irvin, Marguerite R., Shimbo, Daichi, Lackland, Daniel T., Howard, George, Safford, Monika M., Muntner, Paul·2014·Hypertension

Abstract

Refractory hypertension is an extreme phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure. Participants in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study, a large (n=30 239), population-based cohort were evaluated to determine the prevalence of refractory hypertension and associated cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. Refractory hypertension was defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (systolic/diastolic, ≥140/90 mm Hg) on ≥5 antihypertensive drug classes. Participants with resistant hypertension (systolic/diastolic, ≥140/90 mm Hg on ≥3 or <140/90 mm Hg on ≥4 antihypertensive classes) and all participants treated for hypertension served as comparator groups. Of 14 809 REGARDS participants receiving antihypertensive treatment, 78 (0.5%) had refractory hypertension. The prevalence of refractory hypertension was 3.6% among participants with resistant hypertension (n=2144) and 41.7% among participants on ≥5 antihypertensive drug classes. Among all participants with hypertension, black race, male sex, living in the stroke belt or buckle, higher body mass index, lower heart rate, reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, diabetes mellitus, and history of stroke and coronary heart disease were associated with refractory hypertension. Compared with resistant hypertension, prevalence ratios for refractory hypertension were increased for blacks (3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.68–5.37) and those with albuminuria (2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.40–3.52) and diabetes mellitus (2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–3.31). The median 10-year Framingham risk for coronary heart disease and stroke was higher among participants with refractory hypertension when compared with those with either comparator group. These data indicate that although resistant hypertension is relatively common among treated patients with hypertension, true antihypertensive treatment failure is rare.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.02026

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Calhoun, D. A., Booth, J. N., Oparil, S., Irvin, M. R., Shimbo, D., Lackland, D. T., Howard, G., Safford, M. M., & Muntner, P.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2014-03
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
451-458
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2120278829
Cited by
185
References
10
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refractory Hypertension: Determination of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Comorbidities in a Large, Population-Based Cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.02026
The paper
Calhoun, D. A., Booth, J. N., Oparil, S., Irvin, M. R., Shimbo, D., Lackland, D. T., Howard, G., Safford, M. M., & Muntner, P. (2014). Refractory Hypertension: Determination of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Comorbidities in a Large, Population-Based Cohort. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.02026

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.