Cited by 541Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity and the Risk Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

Ohkuma, Toshiaki, Ninomiya, Toshiharu, Tomiyama, Hirofumi, Kario, Kazuomi, Hoshide, Satoshi, Kita, Yoshikuni, Inoguchi, Toyoshi, Maeda, Yasutaka +20 more·2017·Hypertension

Abstract

An individual participant data meta-analysis was conducted in the data of 14 673 Japanese participants without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) to examine the association of the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) with the risk of development of CVD. During the average 6.4-year follow-up period, 687 participants died and 735 developed cardiovascular events. A higher baPWV was significantly associated with a higher risk of CVD, even after adjustments for conventional risk factors ( P for trend <0.001). When the baPWV values were classified into quintiles, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for CVD increased significantly as the baPWV quintile increased. The hazard ratio in the subjects with baPWV values in quintile 5 versus that in those with the values in quintile 1 was 3.50 (2.14–5.74; P <0.001). Every 1 SD increase of the baPWV was associated with a 1.19-fold (1.10–1.29; P <0.001) increase in the risk of CVD. Moreover, addition of baPWV to a model incorporating the Framingham risk score significantly increased the C statistics from 0.8026 to 0.8131 ( P <0.001) and also improved the category-free net reclassification (0.247; P <0.001). The present meta-analysis clearly established baPWV as an independent predictor of the risk of development of CVD in Japanese subjects without preexisting CVD. Thus, measurement of the baPWV could enhance the efficacy of prediction of the risk of development of CVD over that of the Framingham risk score, which is based on the traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.09097

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observa- tional studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008-2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohkuma, T., Ninomiya, T., Tomiyama, H., Kario, K., Hoshide, S., Kita, Y., Inoguchi, T., Maeda, Y., Kohara, K., Tabara, Y., Nakamura, M., Ohkubo, T., Watada, H., Munakata, M., Ohishi, M., Ito, N., Nakamura, M., Shoji, T., Vlachopoulos, C., Yamashina, A., Nagano, M., Yukiyo, O., Kabutoya, T., Asayama, K., Takashima, N., Chowdhury, T. T., Mitsuki-Shinohara, K., & Yamashita, T.
Affiliations
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital (JP)
  • Jichi Medical University (JP)
  • Teikyo University (JP)
  • Shiga University of Medical Science (JP)
  • Department of Family Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Osaka City University (JP)
  • Cardiovascular Institute Hospital (JP)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2017-06
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
1045-1052
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2775143001
Cited by
541
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 9
FWCI
30.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H04123)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, cardiovascular risk prediction, arterial stiffness, Framingham risk score, cardiovascular events, Japanese population, risk stratification, net reclassification improvement
MeSH terms
Aged, Brachial Artery, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Risk Assessment, Ankle Brachial Index, Vascular Stiffness, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review