The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Central and Brachial Blood Pressures, Statins, and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: A Mediation Analysis
Abstract
Central blood pressure may be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease than brachial pressure. Although statins reduce brachial pressure, their impact on central pressure remains unknown. Furthermore, whether this effect is mediated through a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) is unknown. This study aims to characterize the association of statins and LDL-c with central and brachial blood pressures and to quantify their respective effects. Of the 20 004 CARTaGENE participants, 16 507 had available central blood pressure, LDL-c, and Framingham risk score. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the association between central pressure and LDL-c in subjects with or without statins. The impact of LDL-c on the association between statin and pressure parameters was determined through mediation analyses. LDL-c was positively associated with systolic and diastolic central pressure in nonusers (β=0.077 and 0.106; P <0.001) and in participants with statins for primary (β=0.086 and 0.114; P <0.001) and secondary prevention (β=0.120 and 0.194; P <0.003). Statins as primary prevention were associated with lower central systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures (−3.0, −1.6, and −1.3 mm Hg; P <0.001). Mediation analyses showed that LDL-c reduction contributed to 15% of central systolic and 44% of central diastolic pressure changes associated with statins and attenuated 22% of the effects on central pulse pressure. Similar results were found with brachial pressure components. In conclusion, reduction of LDL-c was associated with only a fraction of the lower blood pressures in statin user and seemed to be mostly associated with improvement of steady (diastolic) pressure, whereas non–LDL-c–mediated pathways were mostly associated with changes in pulsatile pressure components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
cSBP was superior to pSBP for the prediction of future cardiovascular events.
“cSBP was superior to pSBP for the prediction of future cardiovascular events [45].”
From Genetic variation in CCDC93 is associated with elevated central systolic blood pressure, impaired arterial relaxation, and mitochondrial dysfunction (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes
American Diabetes Association (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-s005 · Cited by 1,841
Pleiotropic Effects of Statins on the Cardiovascular System
Oesterle, A., Laufs, U., & Liao, J. K. (2017) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.116.308537 · Cited by 1,247
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a · DOI · Paper page
- Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389.
- 10.1159/000137692 · DOI
- 10.2165/1158822-S0-000000000-00000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/01.HYP.0000259737.43916.42 · DOI
- 10.1111/jch.12081 · DOI
- 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089078 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595496 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ajh/hps098 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001786 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01717-5 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.785915 · DOI
- 10.2174/138161209787354186 · DOI
- 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000978 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dys160 · DOI
- 10.1093/ndt/gfw059 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 · DOI · Paper page
- Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2013.
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328333d228 · DOI
- 10.1161/hy0202.098325 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886655 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.070 · DOI
- 10.1185/030079902125001290 · DOI
- 10.1253/circj.72.538 · DOI
- 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130914 · DOI
- 10.2169/internalmedicine.52.0731 · DOI
- 10.1253/circj.72.722 · DOI
- 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138248 · DOI
- 10.1111/eci.12325 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001388 · DOI
- 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32827759a6 · DOI
- 10.3109/07853890.2013.870019 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00132-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.95.2.473 · DOI
- 10.3109/07853890008995944 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M010612200 · DOI
- 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000686 · DOI
- 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101725 · DOI
- 10.1161/JAHA.115.002693 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.hyp.13.4.392 · DOI
- 10.1161/hq0202.104081 · DOI
- 10.1177/1470320314531058 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143085.86697.13 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.073 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kumar, N., Yang, M.-L., Sun, P., Hunker, K. L., Li, J., Jia, J., Fan, F., Wang, J., Ning, X., Gao, W., et al. (2024) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011151 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamarche, F., Agharazii, M., Nadeau-Fredette, A.-C., Madore, F., & Goupil, R.
- Affiliations
- From the Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (F.L., F.M., R.G.) and Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (A.-C.N.-F.), Université de Montréal, Canada; and CHU de Québec, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Université Laval, Canada (M.A.).
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-421
- ISSN
- 0194-911X
- 1524-4563
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review