Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Central and Brachial Blood Pressures, Statins, and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: A Mediation Analysis

Lamarche, Florence, Agharazii, Mohsen, Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire, Madore, François, Goupil, Rémi·2018·Hypertension

Abstract

Central blood pressure may be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease than brachial pressure. Although statins reduce brachial pressure, their impact on central pressure remains unknown. Furthermore, whether this effect is mediated through a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) is unknown. This study aims to characterize the association of statins and LDL-c with central and brachial blood pressures and to quantify their respective effects. Of the 20 004 CARTaGENE participants, 16 507 had available central blood pressure, LDL-c, and Framingham risk score. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the association between central pressure and LDL-c in subjects with or without statins. The impact of LDL-c on the association between statin and pressure parameters was determined through mediation analyses. LDL-c was positively associated with systolic and diastolic central pressure in nonusers (β=0.077 and 0.106; P <0.001) and in participants with statins for primary (β=0.086 and 0.114; P <0.001) and secondary prevention (β=0.120 and 0.194; P <0.003). Statins as primary prevention were associated with lower central systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures (−3.0, −1.6, and −1.3 mm Hg; P <0.001). Mediation analyses showed that LDL-c reduction contributed to 15% of central systolic and 44% of central diastolic pressure changes associated with statins and attenuated 22% of the effects on central pulse pressure. Similar results were found with brachial pressure components. In conclusion, reduction of LDL-c was associated with only a fraction of the lower blood pressures in statin user and seemed to be mostly associated with improvement of steady (diastolic) pressure, whereas non–LDL-c–mediated pathways were mostly associated with changes in pulsatile pressure components.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.10476

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a · DOI · Paper page
  2. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389.
  3. 10.1159/000137692 · DOI
  4. 10.2165/1158822-S0-000000000-00000 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000259737.43916.42 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/jch.12081 · DOI
  7. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089078 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595496 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/ajh/hps098 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001786 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01717-5 · DOI
  12. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.785915 · DOI
  13. 10.2174/138161209787354186 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000978 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/ije/dys160 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/ndt/gfw059 · DOI
  17. 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2013.
  20. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.031 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328333d228 · DOI
  22. 10.1161/hy0202.098325 · DOI
  23. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886655 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.070 · DOI
  25. 10.1185/030079902125001290 · DOI
  26. 10.1253/circj.72.538 · DOI
  27. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130914 · DOI
  28. 10.2169/internalmedicine.52.0731 · DOI
  29. 10.1253/circj.72.722 · DOI
  30. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138248 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/eci.12325 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001388 · DOI
  33. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32827759a6 · DOI
  34. 10.3109/07853890.2013.870019 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00132-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.003 · DOI
  37. 10.1161/01.CIR.95.2.473 · DOI
  38. 10.3109/07853890008995944 · DOI
  39. 10.1074/jbc.M010612200 · DOI
  40. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000686 · DOI
  41. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101725 · DOI
  42. 10.1161/JAHA.115.002693 · DOI
  43. 10.1161/01.hyp.13.4.392 · DOI
  44. 10.1161/hq0202.104081 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/1470320314531058 · DOI
  46. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143085.86697.13 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.073 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lamarche, F., Agharazii, M., Nadeau-Fredette, A.-C., Madore, F., & Goupil, R.
Affiliations
From the Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (F.L., F.M., R.G.) and Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (A.-C.N.-F.), Université de Montréal, Canada; and CHU de Québec, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Université Laval, Canada (M.A.).
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2018-03
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
415-421
ISSN
  • 0194-911X
  • 1524-4563
Cited by
19
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review