Cited by 27Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Comparison Between Home and Ambulatory Morning Blood Pressure and Morning Hypertension in Their Reproducibility and Associations With Vascular Injury

Guo, Qian-Hui, Cheng, Yi-Bang, Zhang, Dong-Yan, Wang, Ying, Huang, Qi-Fang, Sheng, Chang-Sheng, Xu, Ting-Yan, Li, Yan +1 more·2019·Hypertension

Abstract

Morning blood pressure (BP) is recommended to be assessed by either 24-hour ambulatory or home BP monitoring. By which methods morning BP assessed is more reproducible and more closely associated with vascular injury remains unknown. We, therefore, addressed this issue in 1049 referred untreated outpatients (51.9% women; average age, 51 years) who had performed 24-hour ambulatory and 7-day home BP monitoring and vascular evaluations. Irrespective of the assessment methods, morning BPs were all significantly ( P ≤0.027) associated with the arterial measures. The partial correlation coefficients of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio with home morning BPs were greater than those with the ambulatory morning pressures among the first 2 hours after awakening (0.21–0.37 versus 0.15–0.24; P <0.05). The associations with home morning systolic BP remained significant ( P ≤0.002) after full adjustment for evening BP, whereas those with ambulatory morning BPs became nonsignificant after full adjustment for 24-hour BP except that of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity with ambulatory morning (6:00–10:00) systolic BP. Of the 135 subjects who had both home and repeated 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring within 1 month, the coefficients of variation were ≈11% for ambulatory morning BPs and 5% for home self-measurements. In conclusion, morning BP, irrespective of the assessment methods and definitions, was generally reproducible and significantly associated with vascular indices. Nevertheless, home morning BP might be preferred than ambulatory measurements because of better reproducibility and stronger correlation with vascular indices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.12955

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, Q.-H., Cheng, Y.-B., Zhang, D.-Y., Wang, Y., Huang, Q.-F., Sheng, C.-S., Xu, T.-Y., Li, Y., & Wang, J.-G.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2019-07
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
137-144
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2945027725
Cited by
27
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ruijin Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
morning blood pressure, morning hypertension, home blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, reproducibility, vascular injury, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, albumin-creatinine ratio, arterial stiffness
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Blood Pressure Determination, China, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Home Nursing, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Risk Assessment, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Vascular System Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review