Cited by 12Healthcare Quality and ManagementAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchClinical practice guidelines implementation

Quality Improvement in Coronary Care: Analysis of Sustainability and Impact on Adjacent Clinical Measures After a Swedish Controlled, Multicenter Quality Improvement Collaborative

Open access
Carlhed, Rickard, Bellman, Christina, Bojestig, Mats, Bojö, Leif, Peterson, Anette, Lindahl, Bertil, the Quality Improvement in Coronary Care (QUICC) Study Group·2012·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: Quality Improvement in Coronary Care, a Swedish multicenter, controlled quality‐improvement ( QI ) collaborative, has shown significant improvements in adherence to national guidelines for acute myocardial infarction, as well as improved clinical outcome. The objectives of this report were to describe the sustainability of the improvements after withdrawal of study support and a consolidation period of 3 months and to report whether improvements were disseminated to treatments and diagnostic procedures other than those primarily targeted. Methods and Results: Multidisciplinary teams from 19 Swedish hospitals were educated in basic QI methodologies. Another 19 matched hospitals were included as blinded controls. All evaluations were made on the hospital level, and data were obtained from a national quality registry, Swedish Register of Information and Knowledge About Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions (RIKS‐HIA). Sustainability indicators consisted of use of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, lipid‐lowering therapy, clopidogrel, low‐molecular weight heparin, and coronary angiography. Dissemination indicators were use of echocardiography, stress tests, and reperfusion therapy; time delays; and length of stay. At the reevaluation period of 6 months, the improvements at the QI intervention hospitals were sustained in all indicators but 1 (angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor). Between the 2 measurements, the control group improved significantly in all but 1 indicator (angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor). However, at the second measurement, the absolute adherence rates of the intervention hospitals were still numerically higher in all 5 indicators, and significantly so in 1 (clopidogrel). No significant changes were observed for the dissemination indicators. Conclusions: The combination of a systematic QI collaborative with a national, interactive quality registry might lead to substantial and sustained improvements in the quality of acute myocardial infarction care. However, to achieve disseminated improvements in adjacent clinical measures, those adjacent measures probably should be made explicit before any QI intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.112.000737

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlhed, R., Bellman, C., Bojestig, M., Bojö, L., Peterson, A., Lindahl, B., & the Quality Improvement in Coronary Care (QUICC) Study Group
Affiliations
  • Karlstad Central Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Region Jönköpings län (SE)
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2012-08-06
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
e000737-e000737
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099595999
Cited by
12
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
quality improvement, acute myocardial infarction, coronary care, sustainability of quality improvement, guideline adherence, quality register, clopidogrel, lipid-lowering therapy, low molecular weight heparin, coronary angiography, echocardiography, stress testing, reperfusion therapy, length of hospital stay, time delay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review