Cited by 24Health Policy Implementation ScienceMedical Practices and RehabilitationTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Family care map: Sustaining family-centered care in Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers

Open access
Ford, James H., Wise, Meg, Krahn, Dean, Oliver, Karen Anderson, Hall, Carmen, Sayer, Nina·2014·Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Abstract

The study assessed sustainability of the Family Care Map, a family-centered approach to providing care for Veterans with polytrauma-related injuries, in four Department of Veterans Affairs Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers. We applied a mixed-methods approach. Staff surveys used standardized measures of sustainability, commitment to change, information, and participation during implementation. Qualitative inquiry assessed Family Care Map implementation and facilitators and barriers to sustainability. Staff sustainability perceptions had a significant positive correlation with affective commitment to change, participation, and information received about the change process. Family Care Map integration into standard practices and use of its concepts with patients and families related to staff perceptions about sustainability. The degree of use and integration of the Family Care Map in traumatic brain injury/polytrauma care varied among the Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers. Some successful sustainability strategies included integration into daily workflow and organizational culture. Examples of sustainability barriers included staff awareness and use and outdated information. Some practices, such as measuring and documenting the use of the Family Care Map in treatment plans, may not routinely occur. The focus on family-centered care will require further evaluation of organization-, staff-, and innovation-level attributes that influence sustainability of changes designed to improve family-centered care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1682/jrrd.2014.03.0066

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leaders in agencies that successfully sustained A-CHESS took steps to ensure that their strategic decisions and plans for A-CHESS created a coherent vision for organizational transformation; empowered employees to participate in the change process, including providing training; and allocated resources, change policies, procedures, and job descriptions.

    “These leaders took steps to ensure that their strategic decisions and plans for A-CHESS created a coherent vision for organizational transformation; empowered employees to participate in the change process, including providing training; and allocated resources, change policies, procedures, and job descriptions [31,41,42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Dobscha SK Campbell R Morasco BJ Freeman M Helfand MV Evidence-based synthesis program reports Pain in patients with polytrauma: A systematic review Portland (OR) Portland Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center 2008 21155208
  2. [5]Institute of Medicine Returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Assessment of readjustment needs of veterans, service members, and their families Washington (DC) The National Academies Press 2013 24901192
  3. [19]Davies B Edwards N The action cycle: Sustain knowledge use Strauss S Tetroe J Graham ID Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice Oxford (UK) Wiley-Blackwell 2009 165 73

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, J. H., Wise, M., Krahn, D., Oliver, K. A., Hall, C., & Sayer, N.
Affiliations
  • Center for Health Enhancement System Studies, and
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
  • Metropolitan State University (US)
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Published
2014
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
1311-1324
ISSN
  • 0742-3241 (ISSN-L)
  • 0748-7711
  • 1938-1352
OpenAlex
W2111631417
Cited by
24
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA020832, R21DA036700)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
family-centered care, polytrauma rehabilitation, traumatic brain injury, veterans, sustainability of care models, implementation barriers and facilitators, affective commitment to change, employee participation, organizational culture
MeSH terms
Family Health, Female, Humans, Male, Multiple Trauma, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rehabilitation Centers, Veterans Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review