The DOI matches its Crossref record; 196 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 11 of the 145 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive function is an important component of aging and predicts quality of life, functional independence, and risk of institutionalization. Advances in our understanding of the role of cardiovascular risks have shown them to be closely associated with cognitive impairment and dementia. Because many cardiovascular risks are modifiable, it may be possible to maintain brain health and to prevent dementia in later life. The purpose of this American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association presidential advisory is to provide an initial definition of optimal brain health in adults and guidance on how to maintain brain health. We identify metrics to define optimal brain health in adults based on inclusion of factors that could be measured, monitored, and modified. From these practical considerations, we identified 7 metrics to define optimal brain health in adults that originated from AHA’s Life’s Simple 7: 4 ideal health behaviors (nonsmoking, physical activity at goal levels, healthy diet consistent with current guideline levels, and body mass index <25 kg/m 2 ) and 3 ideal health factors (untreated blood pressure <120/<80 mm Hg, untreated total cholesterol <200 mg/dL, and fasting blood glucose <100 mg/dL). In addition, in relation to maintenance of cognitive health, we recommend following previously published guidance from the AHA/American Stroke Association, Institute of Medicine, and Alzheimer’s Association that incorporates control of cardiovascular risks and suggest social engagement and other related strategies. We define optimal brain health but recognize that the truly ideal circumstance may be uncommon because there is a continuum of brain health as demonstrated by AHA’s Life’s Simple 7. Therefore, there is opportunity to improve brain health through primordial prevention and other interventions. Furthermore, although cardiovascular risks align well with brain health, we acknowledge that other factors differing from those related to cardiovascular health may drive cognitive health. Defining optimal brain health in adults and its maintenance is consistent with the AHA’s Strategic Impact Goal to improve cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20% and to reduce deaths resulting from cardiovascular disease and stroke by 20% by the year 2020. This work in defining optimal brain health in adults serves to provide the AHA/American Stroke Association with a foundation for a new strategic direction going forward in cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
74 Not checked yet · 29 Own interpretation · 18 No basis given · 4 Partly supported · 4 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, several additional randomized trials failed to show a beneficial effect of BP reduction on cognition.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Evidence for Maintenance of Brain Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [146] Anderson C Teo K Gao P Arima H Dans A Unger T Commerford P Dyal L Schumacher H Pogue J Paolasso E Holwerda N Chazova I Binbrek A Young J Yusuf S ONTARGET and TRANSCEND Investigators Renin-angiotensin system blockade and cognitive function in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: analysis of data from the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND studies Lancet Neurol 2011 10 43 53 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70250-7 20980201 source
- Not checked yetcites [147] Peters R Beckett N Forette F Tuomilehto J Clarke R Ritchie C Waldman A Walton I Poulter R Ma S Comsa M Burch L Fletcher A Bulpitt C HYVET Investigators Incident dementia and blood pressure lowering in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial cognitive function assessment (HYVET-COG): a double-blind, placebo controlled trial Lancet Neurol 2008 7 683 689 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70143-1 18614402 source
- Not checked yetcites [148] Lithell H Hansson L Skoog I Elmfeldt D Hofman A Olofsson B Trenkwalder P Zanchetti A SCOPE Study Group The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial J Hypertens 2003 21 875 886 10.1097/01.hjh.0000059028.82022.89 12714861
- Partly supportedcites [149] Diener HC Sacco RL Yusuf S Cotton D Ounpuu S Lawton WA Palesch Y Martin RH Albers GW Bath P Bornstein N Chan BP Chen ST Cunha L Dahlöf B De Keyser J Donnan GA Estol C Gorelick P Gu V Hermansson K Hilbrich L Kaste M Lu C Machnig T Pais P Roberts R Skvortsova V Teal P Toni D VanderMaelen C Voigt T Weber M Yoon BW Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) Study Group Effects of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel and telmisartan on disability and cognitive function after recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke in the Prevention Regim sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report no statistically significant difference in MMSE scores between telmisartan and placebo in the PRoFESS trial. The Introduction also reports a nonsignificant pooled reduction in dementia risk across four placebo-controlled studies, but does not establish that each of those trials failed to show a cognitive benefit. The claim’s plural characterization is therefore broader than this paper establishes. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked yetcites [151] Applegate WB Pressel S Wittes J Luhr J Shekelle RB Camel GH Greenlick MR Hadley E Moye L Perry HM Jr Schron E Wegener V Impact of the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension on behavioral variables: results from the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Arch Intern Med 1994 154 2154 2160 7944835 source
- Partly supportedcites [152] Williamson JD Launer LJ Bryan RN Coker LH Lazar RM Gerstein HC Murray AM Sullivan MD Horowitz KR Ding J Marcovina S Lovato L Lovato J Margolis KL Davatzikos C Barzilay J Ginsberg HN Linz PE Miller ME Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Memory in Diabetes Investigators Cognitive function and brain structure in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus after intensive lowering of blood pressure and lipid levels: a randomized clinical trial JAMA Intern Med 2014 174 324 333 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13656 24493100 PMC4423790 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Cognitive Function Outcomes; page not provided) found no significant cognitive benefit from intensive versus standard BP therapy, and the Conclusions report no overall reduction in cognitive decline. This paper reports one BP trial, however, not the several additional BP-reduction trials asserted in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked yetcites [153] Bosch J HOPE Investigators The effect of blood pressure and cholesterol lowering on cognition Circulation 2016 134 e703 e704
- Supportedcites [154] Pearce LA McClure LA Anderson DC Jacova C Sharma M Hart RG Benavente OR SPS3 Investigators Effects of long-term blood pressure lowering and dual antiplatelet treatment on cognitive function in patients with recent lacunar stroke: a secondary analysis from the SPS3 randomised trial Lancet Neurol 2014 13 1177 1185 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70224-8 25453457 PMC4284947 source
The Research in Context systematic review (page unavailable) reports no significant cognitive differences in PRoFESS despite a blood-pressure difference between treatment groups. The Discussion (page unavailable) also says that neither ONTARGET nor TRANSCEND found an effect of blood-pressure control on cognitive function. These are several trials consistent with the claim, though the paper notes that trial results overall were mixed. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In addition, AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 has been linked to successful cognitive health25,94,95,112”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [25] Thacker EL Gillett SR Wadley VG Unverzagt FW Judd SE McClure LA Howard VJ Cushman M The American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 and incident cognitive impairment: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study J Am Heart Assoc 2014 3 e000635 10.1161/JAHA.113.000635 24919926 PMC4309046 source
The Discussion reports that middle-to-high Life’s Simple 7 scores were associated with a lower incidence of cognitive impairment in adults aged 45 and older. This supports the citing sentence’s broad statement that the metric has been linked to cognitive health; the study reports an association, not a causal effect. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Partly supportedcites [94] Beydoun MA Beydoun HA Gamaldo AA Teel A Zonderman Wang Y Epidemiologic studies of modifiable factors associated with cognition and dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Public Health 2014 14 643 10.1186/1471-2458-14-643 24962204 PMC4099157 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports associations between individual factors—including smoking and physical activity—and Alzheimer’s disease risk. But the paper does not assess AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 as a combined measure or link that measure to cognitive health; it supports only part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked yetcites [95] Cohn NB Dustman RE Bradford DC Age-related decrements in Stroop Color Test performance J Clin Psychol 1984 40 1244 1250 6490922
- Supportedcites [112] Reis JP Loria CM Launer LJ Sidney S Liu K Jacobs DR Jr Zhu N Lloyd-Jones DM He K Yaffe K Cardiovascular health through young adulthood and cognitive functioning in midlife Ann Neurol 2013 73 170 179 10.1002/ana.23836 23443990 PMC3608821 source
The Discussion reports a strong graded association between meeting more of the seven AHA ideal cardiovascular-health components from young adulthood to middle age and better cognitive health in midlife. It also reports better performance on each cognitive test among participants who maintained more ideal components. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of vascular risk factor modification on the prevention of cognitive decline have not shown consistent results (Table 2).”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Evidence for Maintenance of Brain Health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A potential benefit of interventions to enhance social or cognitive lifestyle has thus far not convincingly been demonstrated.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Metrics for Defining Optimal Brain Health: AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 > Other Factors
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Cerebrovascular autoregulation maintains cerebral blood flow relatively independently of changes in arterial pressure to protect the brain from damaging fluctuations in cerebral perfusion,28”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Basic Mechanisms and Milieu
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Cipolla MJ The Cerebral Circulation San Rafael, CA Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences 2009 1 59 21452434
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition to regulating cerebral perfusion, the NVU is responsible for the blood-brain barrier, which finely controls the molecular exchange between blood and brain and vice versa through an intricate system of transporters located on the endothelial cell membrane.30”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Basic Mechanisms and Milieu
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Zhao Z Nelson AR Betsholtz C Zlokovic BV Establishment and dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier Cell 2015 163 1064 1078 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.067 26590417 PMC4655822 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many brain disorders manifest later in life but, in fact, are life-course illnesses.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Maintenance of Brain Health Requires Consideration of the Life Continuum
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Vascular risk factors, for example, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, have deleterious effects on the structure and function of cerebral blood vessels, leading to vascular remodeling and stiffness, impaired cerebral blood flow autoregulation, endothelial dysfunction, altered neurovascular coupling, and failure of clearance systems, resulting in neurovascular dysfunction and subopt”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Basic Mechanisms and Milieu
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Faraco G Iadecola C Hypertension: a harbinger of stroke and dementia Hypertension 2013 62 810 817 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01063 23980072 PMC3847558 source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Faraci FM Protecting against vascular disease in brain Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011 300 H1566 H1582 10.1152/ajpheart.01310.2010 21335467 PMC3094081 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, risks for stroke and cardiovascular disease are well positioned to be targets of preventive strategies for cognitive impairment and dementia.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Public Health Impact of Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Stroke, and Cardiovascular and Stroke Risks > Summary
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, having high fasting glucose or diabetes mellitus has been associated with cognitive impairment and dementia.63–65”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Yaffe K Weston AL Blackwell T Krueger KA The metabolic syndrome and development of cognitive impairment among older women Arch Neurol 2009 66 324 328 10.1001/archneurol.2008.566 19273750 PMC2685462 source
- Not checked yetcites [64] Young SE Mainous AG 3rd Carnemolla M Hyperinsulinemia and cognitive decline in a middle-aged cohort Diabetes Care 2006 29 2688 2693 10.2337/dc06-0915 17130206 source
- Not checked yetcites [65] Kalmijn S Foley D White L Burchfiel CM Curb JD Petrovitch H Ross GW Havlik RJ Launer LJ Metabolic cardiovascular syndrome and risk of dementia in Japanese-American elderly men: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000 20 2255 2260 11031212 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 36
- Probably not a substantial claim. 30
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Obesity,71–73 dyslipidemia,74–77 and high BP78,79 are also major contributors to vascular brain health.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [71] Whitmer RA Gunderson EP Barrett-Connor E Quesenberry CP Jr Yaffe K Obesity in middle age and future risk of dementia: a 27 year longitudinal population based study BMJ 2005 330 1360 10.1136/bmj.38446.466238.E0 15863436 PMC558283 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
This citation is attached to obesity, not dyslipidemia or high blood pressure. The Results (Table 2; page unavailable) associate midlife obesity with greater later dementia risk, but the Discussion (Mechanisms of effects; page unavailable) presents a cardiovascular pathway as plausible rather than established. The paper therefore supports obesity's relevance to brain health, but not the stronger claim that it is a major contributor specifically to vascular brain health. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked yetcites [72] Barrett-Connor E An introduction to obesity and dementia Curr Alzheimer Res 2007 4 97 101 17430230 source
- Partly supportedcites [73] Fitzpatrick AL Kuller LH Lopez OL Diehr P O’Meara ES Longstreth WT Jr Luchsinger JA Midlife and late-life obesity and the risk of dementia: Cardiovascular Health Study Arch Neurol 2009 66 336 342 10.1001/archneurol.2008.582 19273752 PMC3513375 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) associate midlife obesity with higher dementia risk and say the relationship was similar for vascular dementia. But the study reports an association, not that obesity is a major causal contributor to vascular brain health; it also finds lower dementia risk with late-life obesity. This citation is attached to obesity, not to dyslipidemia or high blood pressure. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked yetcites [74] Solomon A Kåreholt I Ngandu T Wolozin B Macdonald SW Winblad B Nissinen A Tuomilehto J Soininen H Kivipelto M Serum total cholesterol, statins and cognition in non-demented elderly Neurobiol Aging 2009 30 1006 1009 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.09.012 18022292 source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Solomon A Kivipelto M Wolozin B Zhou J Whitmer RA Midlife serum cholesterol and increased risk of Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia three decades later Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2009 28 75 80 10.1159/000231980 19648749 PMC2814023 source
- Partly supportedcites [76] Reitz C Tang MX Luchsinger J Mayeux R Relation of plasma lipids to Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia Arch Neurol 2004 61 705 714 10.1001/archneur.61.5.705 15148148 PMC2696387 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Risk of Incident VaD; page unavailable) associate higher LDL-C and non–HDL-C levels with greater vascular dementia risk. But the paper’s Conclusions describe the lipid–vascular dementia relation as weak, and the Comment says dyslipidemia has not been convincingly demonstrated as a factor in brain ischemia or vascular dementia. It therefore supports a possible association, not the stronger claim that dyslipidemia is a major contributor to vascular brain health. This citation is attached to dyslipidemia, not obesity or high blood pressure. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked yetcites [77] Mielke MM Zandi PP Sjögren M Gustafson D Ostling S Steen B Skoog I High total cholesterol levels in late life associated with a reduced risk of dementia Neurology 2005 64 1689 1695 10.1212/01.WNL.0000161870.78572.A5 15911792 source
- Not checked yetcites [78] Launer LJ Ross GW Petrovitch H Masaki K Foley D White LR Havlik RJ Midlife blood pressure and dementia: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study Neurobiol Aging 2000 21 49 55 10794848 source
- Not checked yetcites [79] Birns J Kalra L Cognitive function and hypertension J Hum Hypertens 2009 23 86 96 10.1038/jhh.2008.80 18650838 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Studies suggest that midlife and late-life central obesity increases the risk of cognitive impairment but that high late-life obesity (as assessed by BMI) may be protective.71–73”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [71] Whitmer RA Gunderson EP Barrett-Connor E Quesenberry CP Jr Yaffe K Obesity in middle age and future risk of dementia: a 27 year longitudinal population based study BMJ 2005 330 1360 10.1136/bmj.38446.466238.E0 15863436 PMC558283 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that midlife adiposity was associated with greater risk of dementia in old age. But the study did not measure central obesity or assess the risk from late-life obesity; its Strengths and weaknesses section explicitly says a central-obesity measure was not collected. The paper also describes a prospective study finding increased—not protective—dementia risk with obesity in elderly women (Introduction; What is already known on this topic). (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked yetcites [72] Barrett-Connor E An introduction to obesity and dementia Curr Alzheimer Res 2007 4 97 101 17430230 source
- Partly supportedcites [73] Fitzpatrick AL Kuller LH Lopez OL Diehr P O’Meara ES Longstreth WT Jr Luchsinger JA Midlife and late-life obesity and the risk of dementia: Cardiovascular Health Study Arch Neurol 2009 66 336 342 10.1001/archneurol.2008.582 19273752 PMC3513375 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that late-life obesity measured by BMI was associated with lower dementia risk. The Discussion cites findings linking midlife abdominal diameter and late-life waist circumference to dementia, but the latter applied to ages 65–76, not all older adults. This study found no significant association between late-life waist-to-hip ratio and dementia, so it does not support the unqualified claim about late-life central obesity. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, none of the trials showed that dementia was prevented; even the positive trials showed only modest improvements in cognitive performance on neuropsychological tests of unclear significance for daily functioning and quality of life.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Evidence for Maintenance of Brain Health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Because hypertension, obesity, smoking, and diabetes mellitus contribute to cognitive impairment and dementia23,24 and there are interventions that successfully prevent or modify these risk factors, a strategy using AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 to decrease cardiovascular risk, stroke, and heart attack should also contribute to maintenance of brain health.25”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Public Health Impact of Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Stroke, and Cardiovascular and Stroke Risks > Cardiovascular and Stroke Risks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Middleton LE Yaffe K Promising strategies for the prevention of dementia Arch Neurol 2009 66 1210 1215 10.1001/archneurol.2009.201 19822776 PMC2762111 source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Unverzagt FW McClure LA Wadley VG Jenny NS Go RC Cushman M Kissela BM Kelley BJ Kennedy R Moy CS Howard V Howard G Vascular risk factors and cognitive impairment in a stroke-free cohort Neurology 2011 77 1729 1736 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318236ef23 22067959 PMC3208949 source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Thacker EL Gillett SR Wadley VG Unverzagt FW Judd SE McClure LA Howard VJ Cushman M The American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 and incident cognitive impairment: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study J Am Heart Assoc 2014 3 e000635 10.1161/JAHA.113.000635 24919926 PMC4309046 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research has convincingly demonstrated that cardiovascular risk factors are major contributors to late-life cognitive health and risk of stroke and AD.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More recently, molecular interrogation of brain parenchyma through cerebrospinal fluid studies and positron emission tomography imaging of amyloid and tau burden and of brain network connectivity patterns through functional and diffusion-weighted MRI has been added as a marker of subtle brain injury.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > How Do We Define Optimal Brain Health?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a need for a broader perspective of the definition of brain health that does not depend on the mere absence of anatomic and physiological disease and encompasses the potential measurement, monitoring, and modification in individuals and in the population.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > How Do We Define Optimal Brain Health?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the health of the brain is inextricably related to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health, and interventions aimed at promoting cardiovascular health would be expected to promote brain health and vice versa.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Parallels Between Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Health and Brain Health
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“whereas cerebral endothelial cells regulate microvascular flow by releasing vasoactive agents such as nitric oxide and prostanoids.29”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Basic Mechanisms and Milieu
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Andresen J Shafi NI Bryan RM Jr Endothelial influences on cerebro-vascular tone J Appl Physiol (1985) 2006 100 318 327 16357085 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because many cardiovascular risks are modifiable, it may be possible to maintain brain health and to prevent dementia in later life.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Subclinical or silent stroke occurs at least 5 times as commonly as symptomatic stroke and may not be silent because subclinical events are associated with impairment of cognition and disturbances of mood and personality.17”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Public Health Impact of Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Stroke, and Cardiovascular and Stroke Risks > Impact of Stroke
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Hachinski V World Stroke Organization Stroke and potentially preventable dementias proclamation: updated World Stroke Day proclamation [published correction appears in Stroke. 2016;47:d18] Stroke 2015 46 3039 3040 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011237 26504189 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Aging has profound effects on the structure and function of the cerebrovascular system,34,39 which may act in concert with vascular risk factors to further compromise brain health.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Parallels Between Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Health and Brain Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Faraci FM Protecting against vascular disease in brain Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011 300 H1566 H1582 10.1152/ajpheart.01310.2010 21335467 PMC3094081 source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Farkas E Luiten PG Cerebral microvascular pathology in aging and Alzheimer’s disease Prog Neurobiol 2001 64 575 611 11311463 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some definitions additionally emphasize the absence of subclinical injury on brain imaging such as white matter hyperintensities, silent infarcts, microbleeds on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or cognitive function assessment values above the age- and education-dependent normative thresholds.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > How Do We Define Optimal Brain Health?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“With minimal or no energy reserves and the exquisite sensitivity of neurons and glia to chemical changes in the internal milieu, normal brain function is highly dependent on adequate delivery of energy substrates, mainly oxygen and glucose. These are delivered by cerebral blood flow, which, in turn, depends on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Basic Mechanisms and Milieu
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Attwell D Laughlin SB An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001 21 1133 1145 10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001 11598490 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most existing definitions of brain health emphasize an absence of overt vascular or neurodegenerative injury such as from stroke and AD.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > How Do We Define Optimal Brain Health?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Neurovascular coupling ensures that focal increases in brain activity are associated with corresponding increases in blood flow to the activated areas.27”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Basic Mechanisms and Milieu
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Iadecola C Neurovascular regulation in the normal brain and in Alzheimer’s disease Nat Rev Neurosci 2004 5 347 360 10.1038/nrn1387 15100718 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the NVU is critical for maintaining the homeostasis of the cerebral microenvironment, which is essential for brain health (Figure 2).”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Basic Mechanisms and Milieu
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, macroscopic infarcts occur in about one third to one half of elderly individuals, and of all major cognitively impairing disorders, including AD, there is a vascular component in up to 80%.4,18,19”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Public Health Impact of Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Stroke, and Cardiovascular and Stroke Risks > Impact of Stroke
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Gorelick PB Scuteri A Black SE Decarli C Greenberg SM Iadecola C Launer LJ Laurent S Lopez OL Nyenhuis D Petersen RC Schneider JA Tzourio C Arnett DK Bennett DA Chui HC Higashida RT Lindquist R Nilsson PM Roman GC Sellke FW Seshadri S on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Hea source
- Not checked yetcites [18] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Diabetes public health resource https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/figpersons.htm Accessed May 23, 2017
- Not checked yetcites [19] Dichgans M Leys D Vascular cognitive impairment Circ Res 2017 120 573 591 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308426 28154105 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, although cardiovascular risks align well with brain health, we acknowledge that other factors differing from those related to cardiovascular health may drive cognitive health.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The NVU is also involved in the immune surveillance of the brain and in producing growth factors that support the survival of brain cells and blood vessels.33”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Basic Mechanisms and Milieu
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Faraco G Iadecola C Hypertension: a harbinger of stroke and dementia Hypertension 2013 62 810 817 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01063 23980072 PMC3847558 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although this advisory statement is focused on adults, to best prevent late-life disease, interventions focused on modifiable risk and protective factors may ideally need to be applied in young adulthood, possibly as far back as childhood.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Maintenance of Brain Health Requires Consideration of the Life Continuum
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher socioeconomic conditions also provide more opportunities for cognitive enrichment through more complex occupational exposure.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite being well-established key risk factors of cognitive decline, AD, and other dementias, much less is known about how cardiovascular risk factor exposure affects brain health in midlife or earlier in the life course.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Atrial fibrillation is an important risk in that it is causally linked to stroke and subclinical stroke, is increased by certain cardiovascular risks, is associated with cognitive impairment, and is modifiable or preventable.104–106”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] de Bruijn RF Heeringa J Wolters FJ Franco OH Stricker BH Hofman A Koudstaal PJ Ikram MA Association between atrial fibrillation and dementia in the general population JAMA Neurol 2015 72 1288 1294 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2161 26389654 source
- Not checked yetcites [105] Singh-Manoux A Fayosse A Sabia S Canonico M Bobak M Elbaz A Kivimaki M Dugravot A Atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia [published online ahead of print April 29, 2017] Eur Heart J 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx208 https://www.academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx208 Accessed August 14, 2017 PMC5837240 28460139 source
- Not checked yetcites [106] Thacker EL McKnight B Psaty BM Longstreth WT Jr Sitlani CM Dublin S Arnold AM Fitzpatrick AL Gottesman RF Heckbert SR Atrial fibrillation and cognitive decline: a longitudinal cohort study Neurology 2013 81 119 125 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829a33d1 23739229 PMC3770176 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, adherence to a Mediterranean or DASH (Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension) diet80 has been associated with reduced cognitive decline, potentially and controversially a result of homocysteine reduction, and through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory pathways.81–83”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Scarmeas N Stern Y Mayeux R Manly JJ Schupf N Luchsinger JA Mediterranean diet and mild cognitive impairment Arch Neurol 2009 66 216 225 10.1001/archneurol.2008.536 19204158 PMC2653223 source
- Not checked yetcites [81] Welch GN Loscalzo J Homocysteine and atherothrombosis N Engl J Med 1998 338 1042 1050 10.1056/NEJM199804093381507 9535670 source
- Not checked yetcites [82] Miller JW Green R Ramos MI Allen LH Mungas DM Jagust WJ Haan MN Homocysteine and cognitive function in the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging Am J Clin Nutr 2003 78 441 447 12936927 source
- Not checked yetcites [83] Elias MF Sullivan LM D’Agostino RB Elias PK Jacques PF Selhub J Seshadri S Au R Beiser A Wolf PA Homocysteine and cognitive performance in the Framingham Offspring Study: age is important Am J Epidemiol 2005 162 644 653 10.1093/aje/kwi259 16107567 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several population-based studies have found that midlife hypertension or high systolic BP is associated with cognitive dysfunction and decline85–88 and dementia.65,79”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Kivipelto M Helkala EL Hänninen T Laakso MP Hallikainen M Alhainen K Soininen H Tuomilehto J Nissinen A Midlife vascular risk factors and late-life mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study Neurology 2001 56 1683 1689 11425934 source
- Not checked yetcites [86] Reitz C Tang MX Manly J Mayeux R Luchsinger JA Hypertension and the risk of mild cognitive impairment Arch Neurol 2007 64 1734 1740 10.1001/archneur.64.12.1734 18071036 PMC2672564 source
- Not checked yetcites [87] Gottesman RF Schneider AL Albert M Alonso A Bandeen-Roche K Coker L Coresh J Knopman D Power MC Rawlings A Sharrett AR Wruck LM Mosley TH Midlife hypertension and 20-year cognitive change: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study JAMA Neurol 2014 71 1218 1227 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1646 25090106 PMC4226067 source
- Not checked yetcites [88] Knopman D Boland LL Mosley T Howard G Liao D Szklo M McGovern P Folsom AR Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators Cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive decline in middle-aged adults Neurology 2001 56 42 48 11148234 source
- Not checked yetcites [65] Kalmijn S Foley D White L Burchfiel CM Curb JD Petrovitch H Ross GW Havlik RJ Launer LJ Metabolic cardiovascular syndrome and risk of dementia in Japanese-American elderly men: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000 20 2255 2260 11031212 source
- Not checked yetcites [79] Birns J Kalra L Cognitive function and hypertension J Hum Hypertens 2009 23 86 96 10.1038/jhh.2008.80 18650838 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, a number of studies have suggested that various aspects of sleep (eg, short or long sleep duration, excessive daytime sleepiness, greater number of night awakenings) may be associated with poorer cognition or cognitive decline.107–111”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [107] Lo JC Groeger JA Cheng GH Dijk DJ Chee MW Self-reported sleep duration and cognitive performance in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sleep Med 2016 17 87 98 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.08.021 26847980 source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Wu L Sun D Tan Y A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of sleep duration and the occurrence of cognitive disorders [published online ahead of print June 6, 2017] Sleep Breath 10.1007/s11325-017-1527-0 https://www.link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11325-017-1527-0 Accessed August 14, 2017 28589251 source
- Not checked yetcites [109] Devore EE Grodstein F Schernhammer ES Sleep duration in relation to cognitive function among older adults: a systematic review of observational studies Neuroepidemiology 2016 46 57 78 10.1159/000442418 26735553 source
- Not checked yetcites [110] Keage HA Banks S Yang KL Morgan K Brayne C Matthews FE What sleep characteristics predict cognitive decline in the elderly? Sleep Med 2012 13 886 892 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.02.003 22560827 source
- Not checked yetcites [111] Blackwell T Yaffe K Laffan A Ancoli-Israel S Redline S Ensrud KE Song Y Stone KL Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group Associations of objectively and subjectively measured sleep quality with subsequent cognitive decline in older community-dwelling men: the MrOS sleep study Sleep 2014 37 655 663 10.5665/sleep.3562.AB 24899757 PMC4044750 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The statement was independently reviewed by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, while BP lowering has been shown to substantially reduce the risk of stroke, in individuals with elevation of BP, BP lowering in a clinical trial setting has not been shown conclusively to preserve cognitive function.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Evidence for Maintenance of Brain Health
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There is some suggestion for clinical benefit from BP control or multidomain interventions, including vascular risk modification combined with lifestyle and behavioral interventions156”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Evidence for Maintenance of Brain Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [156] Ngandu T Lehtisalo J Solomon A Levälahti E Ahtiluoto S Antikainen R Bäckman L Hänninen T Jula A Laatikainen T Lindström J Mangialasche F Paajanen T Pajala S Peltonen M Rauramaa R Stigsdotter-Neely A Strandberg T Tuomilehto J Soininen H Kivipelto M A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial Lancet 2015 385 2255 2263 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5 25771249 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“head injury, which can in part be influenced by behavior”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Metrics for Defining Optimal Brain Health: AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 > Other Factors
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Modifiable cardiovascular risks are prevalent worldwide, may occur across the age continuum, and are associated with adverse consequences later in life.128,176”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] Gottesman RF Schneider AL Zhou Y Coresh J Green E Gupta N Knopman DS Mintz A Rahmim A Sharrett AR Wagenknecht LE Wong DF Mosley TH Association between midlife vascular risk factors and estimated brain amyloid deposition JAMA 2017 317 1443 1450 10.1001/jama.2017.3090 28399252 PMC5921896 source
- Not checked yetcites [176] GBD 2015 Tobacco Collaborators Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 Lancet 2017 389 1885 1906 28390697 PMC5439023 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“low cardiac output, leading to hypoperfusion dementia”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Metrics for Defining Optimal Brain Health: AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 > Other Factors
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the RCT evidence to prevent cognitive decline and dementia is still incomplete and evolving, the observational epidemiological evidence for modifiable risk factors is substantial.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Although the RCT evidence to prevent cognitive decline and dementia is incomplete but evolving, the observational epidemiological evidence for modifiable risk factors was judged to be substantially in favor of modifying key cardiovascular risks.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Summary of Previous Guidance for Maintenance of Cognitive Vitality From the AHA/ASA and Other Organizations
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
In the paper
“The statement did not recommend changes to the current management of cardiovascular risk factors to prevent dementia”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Summary of Previous Guidance for Maintenance of Cognitive Vitality From the AHA/ASA and Other Organizations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Gorelick PB Scuteri A Black SE Decarli C Greenberg SM Iadecola C Launer LJ Laurent S Lopez OL Nyenhuis D Petersen RC Schneider JA Tzourio C Arnett DK Bennett DA Chui HC Higashida RT Lindquist R Nilsson PM Roman GC Sellke FW Seshadri S on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Hea source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Addressing cardiovascular and stroke risk is a large part of maintaining optimal brain health, but not the only part.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Recommendations for Maintenance of Optimal Brain Health
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The latter outcomes are strongly influenced by metrics that act as antecedents for optimal brain health and serve as ongoing indicators for brain health and the potential for maintenance of optimal brain health.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Rationale for Incorporation of the Ability to Monitor, Measure, and Modify as a Consideration for Defining Metrics of Brain Health and the Distinction Between Metrics and Outcomes
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The only Class I recommendation was, “In people at risk for vascular cognitive impairment, treatment of hypertension is recommended.”4”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Summary of Previous Guidance for Maintenance of Cognitive Vitality From the AHA/ASA and Other Organizations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Gorelick PB Scuteri A Black SE Decarli C Greenberg SM Iadecola C Launer LJ Laurent S Lopez OL Nyenhuis D Petersen RC Schneider JA Tzourio C Arnett DK Bennett DA Chui HC Higashida RT Lindquist R Nilsson PM Roman GC Sellke FW Seshadri S on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Hea source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, although age and genetic factors are among the substantial determinants of brain health, they are not modifiable and thus not well suited as metrics.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Rationale for Incorporation of the Ability to Monitor, Measure, and Modify as a Consideration for Defining Metrics of Brain Health and the Distinction Between Metrics and Outcomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Relevant literature was identified through a systematic review complemented by hand searching of reference lists and expert knowledge of relevant articles focused primarily on topics relating to brain health and maintenance of brain health.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Air pollution is the factor that has been studied the most, but the results have not been consistent. Thus, air pollution was not included as a metric for optimal brain health in this AHA statement.120–122”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Optimal Brain Health > Risk Factors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] Peters R Peters J Booth A Mudway I Is air pollution associated with increased risk of cognitive decline? A systematic review Age Ageing 2015 44 755 760 10.1093/ageing/afv087 26188335 source
- Not checked yetcites [121] Jung CR Lin YT Hwang BF Ozone, particulate matter, and newly diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan J Alzheimers Dis 2015 44 573 584 10.3233/JAD-140855 25310992 source
- Not checked yetcites [122] Loop MS Kent ST Al-Hamdan MZ Crosson WL Estes SM Estes MG Jr Quattrochi DA Hemmings SN Wadley VG McClure LA Fine particulate matter and incident cognitive impairment in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort [published correction appears in PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125137] PLoS One 2013 8 e75001 10.1371/journal.pone.0075001 24086422 PMC3783452 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the clinical trials showed that implementing a long-term multi-domain lifestyle intervention was feasible and in some cases improved cognition, the applicability and cost-effectiveness of such labor-intensive interventions (ie, often requiring a lifestyle coach, nutritionist, and supervised exercise sessions) in the general population are unclear.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Evidence for Maintenance of Brain Health
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another scientific statement found insufficient evidence on how to prevent or treat silent cerebrovascular disease (including silent strokes) detected on neuroimaging, which has been associated with increased risk of future dementia.143”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Summary of Previous Guidance for Maintenance of Cognitive Vitality From the AHA/ASA and Other Organizations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [143] Smith EE Saposnik G Biessels GJ Doubal FN Fornage M Gorelick PB Greenberg SM Higashida RT Kasner SE Seshadri S on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Council on Hypertension Prevention of stroke in patients with silent cerebrovascular disease: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke 2017 48 e44 e71 10.1161/STR.0000000000000116 27980126 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, primordial prevention may be a powerful means to prevent key primary and secondary cardiovascular outcomes because once risk factors are present, one may not be able to optimally reduce stroke and cardiovascular disease risk.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Evidence for Maintenance of Brain Health
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, those CHA cohort members who had a favorable health profile in midlife had prolonged survival by ≈4 years and postponed onset of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality of 7 years.173”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [173] Allen NB Zhao L Liu L Daviglus M Liu K Fries J Shih YT Garside D Vu TH Stamler J Lloyd-Jones DM Favorable cardiovascular health, compression of morbidity, and healthcare costs: forty-year follow-up of the CHA Study (Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry) Circulation 2017 135 1693 1701 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026252 28461414 PMC5476215 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In this study, there was compression of activities of daily living disability, but life-span extension was associated with expansion of disability of physical and cognitive functioning because there were more frail elderly who survived health problems.175”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [175] Zeng Y Feng Q Hesketh T Christensen K Vaupel JW Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study Lancet 2017 389 1619 1629 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30548-2 28285816 PMC5406246 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A more contemporary scientific statement found inconclusive evidence that BP control preserves cognition in the population at-large.5”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Summary of Previous Guidance for Maintenance of Cognitive Vitality From the AHA/ASA and Other Organizations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Iadecola C Yaffe K Biller J Bratzke LC Faraci FM Gorelick PB Gulati M Kamel H Knopman DS Launer LJ Saczynski JS Seshadri S Zeki Al Hazzouri A on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Hypertension; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Stroke Council Impact of hypertension on cognitive function: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Hypertension 2016 68 e67 e94 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000053 27977393 PMC5361411 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“atrial fibrillation, which can be prevented or efficiently monitored and treated to prevent cardioembolism”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Metrics for Defining Optimal Brain Health: AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 > Other Factors
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“education may affect brain health by enhancing the capacity to compensate for the effects of brain pathology on brain function (eg, cognitive reserve)”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Metrics for Defining Optimal Brain Health: AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 > Other Factors
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Observational epidemiological study shows that individuals with hypertension treated to a BP <120/<80 mm Hg have less risk of stroke and cardiovascular events, but that risk is not as low as those the risk for those who have maintained untreated BP <120/<80 mmHg.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Evidence for Maintenance of Brain Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [159] Liu K Colangelo LA Daviglus ML Goff DC Pletcher M Schreiner PJ Sibley CT Burke GL Post WS Michos ED Lloyd-Jones DM Can antihypertensive treatment restore the risk of cardiovascular disease to ideal levels? The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) J Am Heart Assoc 2015 4 e002275 26391135 PMC4599509 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, all morbidities were reduced, compression of morbidity was observed both absolutely and relatively, and there were lower cumulative and annual healthcare costs during the Medicare-eligibility life span in older ages for those with favorable cardiovascular health profiles in midlife.173”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [173] Allen NB Zhao L Liu L Daviglus M Liu K Fries J Shih YT Garside D Vu TH Stamler J Lloyd-Jones DM Favorable cardiovascular health, compression of morbidity, and healthcare costs: forty-year follow-up of the CHA Study (Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry) Circulation 2017 135 1693 1701 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026252 28461414 PMC5476215 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All writing committee members were required to declare conflicts of interest.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Available evidence from study of AHA’s Life’s Simple 7 indicates that these factors play a role in the preservation of cognition and can be measured, modified, and monitored.25,112”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Metrics for Defining Optimal Brain Health: AHA’s Life’s Simple 7
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Thacker EL Gillett SR Wadley VG Unverzagt FW Judd SE McClure LA Howard VJ Cushman M The American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 and incident cognitive impairment: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study J Am Heart Assoc 2014 3 e000635 10.1161/JAHA.113.000635 24919926 PMC4309046 source
- Not checked yetcites [112] Reis JP Loria CM Launer LJ Sidney S Liu K Jacobs DR Jr Zhu N Lloyd-Jones DM He K Yaffe K Cardiovascular health through young adulthood and cognitive functioning in midlife Ann Neurol 2013 73 170 179 10.1002/ana.23836 23443990 PMC3608821 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The writing committee concluded that the evidence was sufficiently strong to support promotion of physical activity, management of vascular risk factors, healthy eating, and lifelong learning and cognitive training.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Maintenance of Brain Health > Summary of Previous Guidance for Maintenance of Cognitive Vitality From the AHA/ASA and Other Organizations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [160] Baumgart M Snyder HM Carrillo MC Fazio S Kim H Johns H Summary of the evidence on modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia: a population-based perspective Alzheimers Dement 2015 11 718 726 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.05.016 26045020 source
boosted- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, there is a limited but increasing body of knowledge on the importance of childhood exposures affecting cognition in later life.183”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [183] Livingston G Sommerlad A Orgeta V Costafreda SG Huntley J Ames D Ballard C Banerjee S Burns A Cohen-Mansfield J Cooper C Fox N Gitlin LN Howard R Kales HC Larson EB Ritchie K Rockwood K Sampson EL Samus Q Schneider LS Selbæk G Teri L Mukadam N Dementia prevention, intervention and care [published online ahead of print on July 19, 2017] Lancet 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6 Accessed August 14, 2017 28735855 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This approach may apply to elderly populations.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Brain health is an important component of successful aging and one in which cardiovascular risks seem to play a key role.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion > Future Directions and the AHA Strategic Impact Goal
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, intrauterine and early-life exposures may play important roles in neurocognitive development, as may stress in early life.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia may be viewed as a lifelong process predicated on a number of antecedent factors, with cardiovascular risks playing an important role.112”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [112] Reis JP Loria CM Launer LJ Sidney S Liu K Jacobs DR Jr Zhu N Lloyd-Jones DM He K Yaffe K Cardiovascular health through young adulthood and cognitive functioning in midlife Ann Neurol 2013 73 170 179 10.1002/ana.23836 23443990 PMC3608821 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and is an ideal starting point for defining optimal brain health because it is easy to measure, monitor, and modify.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Recently, it has been shown that a forager-horticulturalist population, the South American Tsimane of Bolivia, who have few coronary artery disease risk factors, have the lowest reported levels of coronary artery disease of any population,178 suggesting the value of primordial prevention.”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Kaplan H Thompson RC Trumble BC Wann LS Allam AH Beheim B Frohlich B Sutherland ML Sutherland JD Stieglitz J Rodriguez DE Michalik DE Rowan CJ Lombardi GP Bedi R Garcia AR Min JK Narula J Finch CE Gurven M Thomas GS Coronary atherosclerosis in indigenous South American Tsimane: a cross-sectional cohort study Lancet 2017 389 1730 1739 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30752-3 28320601 PMC6028773 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Furthermore, cardiovascular mortality, including ischemic heart disease and stroke, may vary substantially on the basis of geographic variation.177”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [177] Roth GA Dwyer-Lindgren L Bertozzi-Villa A Stubbs RW Morozoff C Naghavi M Mokdad AH Murray CJL Trends and patterns of geographic variation in cardiovascular mortality among US counties, 1980–2014 JAMA 2017 317 1976 1992 28510678 PMC5598768 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In addition, favorable cardiovascular health may be associated with lower healthcare expenditures and resource use.182”
§ Defining Optimal Brain Health in Adults > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [182] Osondu CU Aneni EC Valero-Elizondo J Salami JA Rouseff M Das S Guzman H Younus A Ogunmoroti O Feldman T Agatston AS Veledar E Katzen B Calitz C Sanchez E Lloyd-Jones DM Nasir K Favorable cardiovascular health is associated with lower health care expenditures and resource utilization in a large US employee population: the Baptist Health South Florida Employee Study [published online ahead of print March 13, 2017] Mayo Clin Proc 2017 92 512 524 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.12.026 https://www.linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0025-6196(17)30088-5 Accessed August 14, 2017 28365099 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,852
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,007
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · Cited by 15,025
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Preventing Dementia and Cognitive Impairment. Leshner AI, Landis S, Stroud C, Downey A, eds. In: Preventing Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Way Forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2017:1–130. http://www.nap.edu/24782. Accessed June 23, 2017.
- Welsh KA, Breitner JC, Magruder-Habib KM. Detection of dementia in the elderly using telephone screening of cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1993;6:103–110.
- Glymour M. Identifying Social Determinants of Old Age Cognitive Function [thesis]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University; 2004.
- 10.1097/01.hjh.0000059028.82022.89 · DOI
- Bosch J; HOPE Investigators. The effect of blood pressure and cholesterol lowering on cognition. Circulation. 2016;134:e703–e704.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
Tin, A., Bressler, J., Simino, J., Sullivan, K. J., Mei, H., Windham, B. G., Griswold, M., Gottesman, R. F., Boerwinkle, E., Fornage, M., et al. (2022) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000200520 · Cited by 33
Friedman, B. B., Suri, S., Solé-Padullés, C., Düzel, S., Drevon, C. A., Baaré, W. F. C., Bartrés-Faz, D., Fjell, A. M., Johansen-Berg, H., Madsen, K. S., et al. (2020) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnz155 · Cited by 20
GERMAN, C. A., FANNING, J., SINGLETON, M. J., SHAPIRO, M. D., BRUBAKER, P. H., BERTONI, A. G., & YEBOAH, J. (2022) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002856 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorelick, P. B., Furie, K. L., Iadecola, C., Smith, E. E., Waddy, S. P., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Bae, H.-J., Bauman, M. A., Dichgans, M., Duncan, P. W., Girgus, M., Howard, V. J., Lazar, R. M., Seshadri, S., Testai, F. D., van Gaal, S., Yaffe, K., Wasiak, H., & Zerna, C.
- Affiliations
- Also a member of Maintenance of Brain Health writing group section. Also a member of Optimal Brain Health writing group section. Lead of Maintenance of Brain Health writing group section. Lead of Public Health Impact of Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Stroke, and Cardiovascular and Stroke Risks writing group section. Senior reviewer.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e284-e303
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- PMC
- PMC5654545
- OpenAlex
- W2750828728
- Semantic Scholar
- bdfb5e28fe77abe8675cdd7d96e851d59f91dae8
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 203
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Stroke (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association
- Office of Science
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG010129)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS034179, R01NS095692, R37NS089323, R01NS100447, R21NS096972, R01NS037853, R01NS095441, R01NS017950)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Keywords
- cognitive health, dementia prevention, cardiovascular risk factors, Life's Essential 8, Life's Simple 7, blood pressure, cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, physical activity, diet, smoking, body mass index, social engagement, primordial prevention, cognitive impairment, aging
- MeSH terms
- Adult, American Heart Association, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Health Promotion, Humans, United States, Health Behavior, Stroke, Advisory Committees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review