Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Computerized Algorithm for Etiologic Classification of Ischemic Stroke: The Causative Classification of Stroke System

Ay, Hakan, Benner, Thomas, Murat Arsava, E., Furie, Karen L., Singhal, Aneesh B., Jensen, Matt B., Ayata, Cenk, Towfighi, Amytis, Smith, Eric E., Chong, Ji Y., Koroshetz, Walter J., Sorensen, A. Gregory·2007·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The SSS-TOAST is an evidence-based classification algorithm for acute ischemic stroke designed to determine the most likely etiology in the presence of multiple competing mechanisms. In this article, we present an automated version of the SSS-TOAST, the Causative Classification System (CCS), to facilitate its utility in multicenter settings. Methods— The CCS is a web-based system that consists of questionnaire-style classification scheme for ischemic stroke (http://ccs.martinos.org). Data entry is provided via checkboxes indicating results of clinical and diagnostic evaluations. The automated algorithm reports the stroke subtype and a description of the classification rationale. We evaluated the reliability of the system via assessment of 50 consecutive patients with ischemic stroke by 5 neurologists from 4 academic stroke centers. Results— The kappa value for inter-examiner agreement was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.91) for the 5-item CCS (large artery atherosclerosis, cardio-aortic embolism, small artery occlusion, other causes, and undetermined causes), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.89) with the undetermined group broken into cryptogenic embolism, other cryptogenic, incomplete evaluation, and unclassified groups (8-item CCS), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.83) for a 16-item breakdown in which diagnoses were stratified by the level of confidence. The intra-examiner reliability was 0.90 (0.75–1.00) for 5-item, 0.87 (0.73–1.00) for 8-item, and 0.86 (0.75–0.97) for 16-item CCS subtypes. Conclusions— The web-based CCS allows rapid analysis of patient data with excellent intra- and inter-examiner reliability, suggesting a potential utility in improving the fidelity of stroke classification in multicenter trials or research databases in which accurate subtyping is critical.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.107.490896

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Ay, H., Benner, T., Murat Arsava, E., Furie, K. L., Singhal, A. B., Jensen, M. B., Ayata, C., Towfighi, A., Smith, E. E., Chong, J. Y., Koroshetz, W. J., & Sorensen, A. G.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2007-11
Volume
38
Issue
11
Pages
2979-2984
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2101163891
Cited by
455
References
18
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Computerized Algorithm for Etiologic Classification of Ischemic Stroke: The Causative Classification of Stroke System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.107.490896
The paper
Ay, H., Benner, T., Murat Arsava, E., Furie, K. L., Singhal, A. B., Jensen, M. B., Ayata, C., Towfighi, A., Smith, E. E., Chong, J. Y., Koroshetz, W. J., & Sorensen, A. G. (2007). A Computerized Algorithm for Etiologic Classification of Ischemic Stroke: The Causative Classification of Stroke System. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.107.490896

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.