Cited by 541Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsSpinal Cord Injury Research

Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study

Hornby, T. George, Campbell, Donielle D., Kahn, Jennifer H., Demott, Tobey, Moore, Jennifer L., Roth, Heidi R.·2008·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—Locomotor training (LT) using a treadmill can improve walking ability over conventional rehabilitation in individuals with hemiparesis, although the personnel requirements often necessary to provide LT may limit its application. Robotic devices that provide consistent symmetrical assistance have been developed to facilitate LT, although their effectiveness in improving locomotor ability has not been well established. Methods—Forty-eight ambulatory chronic stroke survivors stratified by severity of locomotor deficits completed a randomized controlled study on the effects of robotic- versus therapist-assisted LT. Both groups received 12 LT sessions for 30 minutes at similar speeds, with guided symmetrical locomotor assistance using a robotic orthosis versus manual facilitation from a single therapist using an assist-as-needed paradigm. Outcome measures included gait speed and symmetry, and clinical measures of activity and participation. Results—Greater improvements in speed and single limb stance time on the impaired leg were observed in subjects who received therapist-assisted LT, with larger speed improvements in those with less severe gait deficits. Perceived rating of the effects of physical limitations on quality of life improved only in subjects with severe gait deficits who received therapist-assisted LT. Conclusions—Therapist-assisted LT facilitates greater improvements in walking ability in ambulatory stroke survivors as compared to a similar dosage of robotic-assisted LT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.107.504779

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gravity compensation is mostly used in locomotion training for patients in orthotic devices such as the Lokomat.

    “This form of haptic support is mostly used in locomotion training for patients in an orthotic device such as the Lokomat (Hidler et al., 2009;Hornby et al., 2008;Husemann et al., 2007;Mayr et al., 2007).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Hornby et al., 2008

    The Training Protocol describes body-weight support during Lokomat-assisted locomotor training, supporting the Lokomat as an example. It also says the therapist-assisted group received body-weight support, so the paper does not establish that this form of support is mostly used with orthotic devices. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Results of robot-assisted therapy are controversial: some studies reported patients profit more from conventional therapy than robot-aided therapy, while others reported the opposite.

    “However, the results are controversial: Some studies reported that patients profit more from conventional therapy than from robotaided therapy (Hidler et al., 2009;Hornby et al., 2008), whereas others reported the opposite (Husemann, Muller, Krewer, Heller, & Koenig, 2007;Lo et al., 2010;Mayr et al., 2007).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]6. Ada L, Dean CM, Hall JM, Bampton J, Crompton S. A treadmill and overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: A placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1486 -1491.
  2. [11]11. Barbeau H, Visintin M. Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1458 -1465.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hornby, T. G., Campbell, D. D., Kahn, J. H., Demott, T., Moore, J. L., & Roth, H. R.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2008-06
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1786-1792
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W1998681803
Cited by
541
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
FWCI
42.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
chronic stroke, locomotor training, robot-assisted gait training, treadmill training, hemiparesis, walking speed, gait symmetry, quality of life, stroke rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Adult, Aged, Exercise Test, Female, Gait, Humans, Leg, Locomotion, Male, Middle Aged, Orthotic Devices, Paresis, Physical Fitness, Robotics, User-Computer Interface, Treatment Outcome, Muscle, Skeletal, Recovery of Function, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Stroke, Physical Therapy Modalities, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review