Cited by 552Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Strokes Compared: Stroke Severity, Mortality, and Risk Factors

Andersen, Klaus Kaae, Olsen, Tom Skyhøj, Dehlendorff, Christian, Kammersgaard, Lars Peter·2009·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Stroke patients with hemorrhagic (HS) and ischemic strokes were compared with regard to stroke severity, mortality, and cardiovascular risk factors. Methods— A registry started in 2001, with the aim of registering all hospitalized stroke patients in Denmark, now holds information for 39 484 patients. The patients underwent an evaluation including stroke severity (Scandinavian Stroke Scale), CT, and cardiovascular risk factors. They were followed-up from admission until death or censoring in 2007. Independent predictors of death were identified by means of a survival model based on 25 123 individuals with a complete data set. Results— Of the patients 3993 (10.1%) had HS. Stroke severity was almost linearly related to the probability of having HS (2% in patients with the mildest stroke and 30% in those with the most severe strokes). Factors favoring ischemic strokes vs HS were diabetes, atrial fibrillation, previous myocardial infarction, previous stroke, and intermittent arterial claudication. Smoking and alcohol consumption favored HS, whereas age, sex, and hypertension did not herald stroke type. Compared with ischemic strokes, HS was associated with an overall higher mortality risk (HR, 1.564; 95% CI, 1.441–1.696). The increased risk was, however, time-dependent; initially, risk was 4-fold, after 1 week it was 2.5-fold, and after 3 weeks it was 1.5-fold. After 3 months stroke type did not correlate to mortality. Conclusion— Strokes are generally more severe in patients with HS. Within the first 3 months after stroke, HS is associated with a considerable increase of mortality, which is specifically associated with the hemorrhagic nature of the lesion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.108.540112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, K. K., Olsen, T. S., Dehlendorff, C., & Kammersgaard, L. P.
Affiliations
Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2009-06
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
2068-2072
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2032215495
Cited by
552
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Keywords
hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, stroke severity, mortality, cardiovascular risk factors, Scandinavian Stroke Scale, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, intermittent claudication, smoking, alcohol consumption
MeSH terms
Aged, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Brain Ischemia, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Smoking, Survival, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review