Cited by 47Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Effect of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin on Mortality: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Open access
Palacio, Santiago, Hart, Robert G., Pearce, Lesly A., Benavente, Oscar R.·2012·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: In the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) trial, addition of clopidogrel to aspirin was associated with an unexpected increase in mortality in patients with lacunar strokes. We assessed the effect of the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin on mortality in a meta-analysis of published randomized trials. Methods—: Randomized trials in which clopidogrel was added to aspirin in subjects with vascular disease or vascular risk factors were identified. Trials were restricted to those with a mean follow-up of ≥14 days in which both the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel was tested and mortality was reported. Results—: Twelve trials included 90 934 participants (mean age, 63 years; 70% men; median follow-up, 1 year) with 6849 observed deaths. There was no significant increase in mortality with the combination therapy either in 4 short-term (14 days–3 months; OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87–0.99) or in 7 long-term (>3 months; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91–1.04) trials after 1 long-term trial (the SPS3 trial) was excluded because of heterogeneity. Addition of clopidogrel was associated with an increase in fatal hemorrhage (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.97–1.90) and a reduction in myocardial infarction (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74–0.91). Conclusions—: The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin has no overall effect on mortality. The SPS3 trial results are outliers, possibly because of a lower prevalence of coronary artery ischemia. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin increases fatal bleeding and reduces myocardial infarction. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http//www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00059306.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.112.656173

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many stroke trials have not explicitly separated ischaemic stroke subtypes, so they may have missed subtype-specific differences in treatment response.

    “Many trials have not differentiated ischaemic stroke subtypes explicitly, potentially overlooking any differences in treatment response between subtypes.18”
  • Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone caused an excess of haemorrhage and death in patients with lacunar stroke, possibly because lacunar patients lacked large artery atheromatous disease to prevent, which is further evidence that SVD is largely non-atheromatous.

    “Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone caused an excess of haemorrhage (mostly systemic) and death in patients with lacunar stroke,13,76 possibly because patients with lacunar as opposed to other ischaemic stroke subtypes lacked any large artery atheromatous disease to prevent (eg myocardial infarction, large artery stroke, etc),18 further evidence of the largely non-atheromatous nature of”
  • Patients without atheroma may receive less long-term benefit from anti-atheromatous treatments.

    “However it may be important to differentiate any due to focal atheroma from non-atheromatous lacunar ischaemic stroke as patients without atheroma may get less long term benefit from anti-atheromatous treatments.13,18,76”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palacio, S., Hart, R. G., Pearce, L. A., & Benavente, O. R.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2012-08
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
2157-2162
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2099852184
Cited by
47
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS038529)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
clopidogrel, aspirin, combination antiplatelet therapy, mortality, fatal hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, SPS3 trial, lacunar stroke, vascular disease, vascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Clopidogrel, Adult, Aged, Aspirin, Cause of Death, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Ticlopidine, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review