Cited by 679Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

Effects of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with recent lacunar stroke

Open access
The SPS3 Investigators·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lacunar infarcts are a frequent type of stroke caused mainly by cerebral small-vessel disease. The effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention has not been defined. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, multicenter trial involving 3020 patients with recent symptomatic lacunar infarcts identified by magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 75 mg of clopidogrel or placebo daily; patients in both groups received 325 mg of aspirin daily. The primary outcome was any recurrent stroke, including ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: The participants had a mean age of 63 years, and 63% were men. After a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, the risk of recurrent stroke was not significantly reduced with aspirin and clopidogrel (dual antiplatelet therapy) (125 strokes; rate, 2.5% per year) as compared with aspirin alone (138 strokes, 2.7% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 1.16), nor was the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.09) or disabling or fatal stroke (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.64). The risk of major hemorrhage was almost doubled with dual antiplatelet therapy (105 hemorrhages, 2.1% per year) as compared with aspirin alone (56, 1.1% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.71; P<0.001). Among classifiable recurrent ischemic strokes, 71% (133 of 187) were lacunar strokes. All-cause mortality was increased among patients assigned to receive dual antiplatelet therapy (77 deaths in the group receiving aspirin alone vs. 113 in the group receiving dual antiplatelet therapy) (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.04; P=0.004); this difference was not accounted for by fatal hemorrhages (9 in the group receiving dual antiplatelet therapy vs. 4 in the group receiving aspirin alone). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with recent lacunar strokes, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and did significantly increase the risk of bleeding and death. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; SPS3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00059306.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1204133

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients without atheroma may receive less long-term benefit from anti-atheromatous treatments.

    “However it may be important to differentiate any due to focal atheroma from non-atheromatous lacunar ischaemic stroke as patients without atheroma may get less long term benefit from anti-atheromatous treatments.13,18,76”
  • Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone caused an excess of haemorrhage and death in patients with lacunar stroke, possibly because lacunar patients lacked large artery atheromatous disease to prevent, which is further evidence that SVD is largely non-atheromatous.

    “Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone caused an excess of haemorrhage (mostly systemic) and death in patients with lacunar stroke,13,76 possibly because patients with lacunar as opposed to other ischaemic stroke subtypes lacked any large artery atheromatous disease to prevent (eg myocardial infarction, large artery stroke, etc),18 further evidence of the largely non-atheromatous nature of”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The SPS3 Investigators
Corresponding author
The SPS3 Investigators
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-08-30
Volume
367
Issue
9
Pages
817-825
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W191849520
Cited by
679
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 6
FWCI
40.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS038529, U01NS38529-04A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Keywords
clopidogrel, aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy, lacunar infarction, stroke recurrence, secondary stroke prevention, cerebral small vessel disease, intracranial hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, antiplatelet therapy
MeSH terms
Clopidogrel, Aspirin, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Recurrence, Ticlopidine, Stroke, Stroke, Lacunar

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review