Cited by 108Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementSex and Gender in Healthcare

Factors influencing sex differences in poststroke functional outcome

Open access
Lisabeth, Lynda D., Reeves, Mathew J., Baek, Jonggyu, Skolarus, Lesli E., Brown, Devin L., Zahuranec, Darin B., Smith, Melinda A., Morgenstern, Lewis B.·2015·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: Our objective was to identify factors that contribute to or modify the sex difference in poststroke functional outcome. Methods—: Ischemic strokes (n=439) were identified from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project (2008–2011). Data were ascertained from interviews (baseline and 90 days post stroke) and medical records. Functional outcome was measured as an average of 22 activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental ADL items (range, 1–4; higher scores worse function). Tobit regression was used to estimate sex differences and to identify confounding and modifying factors. Results—: Fifty-one percent were women. Median age was 71 (interquartile range, 59–80) years in women and 64 (interquartile range, 56–77) years in men. Median ADL/instrumental ADL score at 90 days was 2.7 (interquartile range, 1.8–3.6) in women and 2.0 (interquartile range, 1.3–3.1) in men ( P <0.01); this difference remained after age-adjustment ( P <0.001). Factors contributing to higher ADL/instrumental ADL scores in women included prestroke function, marital status, prestroke cognition, nursing home residence, stroke severity, history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, and body mass index; prestroke function was the largest contributor. Stroke severity modified the sex difference in outcome such that differences were apparent for mild to moderate but not severe strokes. After adjustment, women still had significantly worse functional outcome than men. Conclusions—: These findings yield insight into possible strategies and subgroups to target to reduce the sex disparity in stroke outcome; demographics and prestroke and clinical factors explained only 41% of the sex difference in stroke outcome highlighting the need for future research to identify modifiable factors that contribute to sex differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.114.007985

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women in North America carry a larger stroke burden than men, including higher lifetime stroke risk, higher lifetime stroke death risk, and worse post-stroke outcomes.

    “In North America, women bear a greater burden of disease due to a higher lifetime risk of stroke,1 a higher lifetime risk of death from stroke, and a higher risk of poor outcomes following stroke compared with men.2–4”

    From Sex Differences in Physical Activity and Incident Stroke: A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results and Discussion report worse 90-day functional outcomes for women after stroke. They do not establish a higher lifetime risk of stroke or death from stroke; the Results instead report no sex difference in age-adjusted 90-day mortality. The Discussion also cautions that findings from one south Texas community may not generalize across North America. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lisabeth, L. D., Reeves, M. J., Baek, J., Skolarus, L. E., Brown, D. L., Zahuranec, D. B., Smith, M. A., & Morgenstern, L. B.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2015-03
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
860-863
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2013573491
Cited by
108
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG038731)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS073685, R01NS070941, R01NS038916, U24NS107214, R01NS38916)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
sex differences, functional outcome, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, ischemic stroke, stroke severity, marital status, nursing home residence, transient ischemic attack, body mass index
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Texas, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review