Cited by 178Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and Health

Effects of Physical Activity on Poststroke Cognitive Function: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Open access
Oberlin, Lauren E., Waiwood, Aashna M., Cumming, Toby B., Marsland, Anna L., Bernhardt, Julie, Erickson, Kirk I.·2017·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Despite the social, health, and economic burdens associated with cognitive impairment poststroke, there is considerable uncertainty about the types of interventions that might preserve or restore cognitive abilities. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of physical activity (PA) training on cognitive function poststroke and identify intervention and sample characteristics that may moderate treatment effects. Methods— Randomized controlled trials examining the association between structured PA training and cognitive performance poststroke were identified using electronic databases EMBASE and MEDLINE. Intervention effects were represented by Hedges’ g and combined into pooled effect sizes using random- and mixed-effects models. Effect sizes were subjected to moderation analyses using the between-group heterogeneity test. Results— Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, representing data from 736 participants. The primary analysis yielded a positive overall effect of PA training on cognitive performance (Hedges’ g [95% confidence interval]=0.304 [0.14–0.47]). Mixed-effects analyses demonstrated that combined aerobic and strength training programs generated the largest cognitive gains and that improvements in cognitive performance were achieved even in the chronic stroke phase (mean=2.6 years poststroke). Positive moderate treatment effects were found for attention/processing speed measures (Hedges’ g [confidence interval]=0.37 [0.10–0.63]), while the executive function and working memory domains did not reach significance ( P >0.05). Conclusions— We found a significant positive effect of PA training on cognition poststroke with small to moderate treatment effects that are apparent even in the chronic stroke phase. Our findings support the use of PA training as a treatment strategy to promote cognitive recovery in stroke survivors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.117.017319

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Chen X Effect of community-based-rehabilitation on activities of daily life and cognitive function in stroke patients Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation 2006 10 4 6
  2. [22]Higgins JP Green S Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4 West Sussex, England John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oberlin, L. E., Waiwood, A. M., Cumming, T. B., Marsland, A. L., Bernhardt, J., & Erickson, K. I.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2017-11
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
3093-3100
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2754145207
Cited by
178
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG053952, P30AG024827)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH090333)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T90DA022761)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA196762)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK095172)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
physical activity training, post-stroke cognitive impairment, cognitive recovery, aerobic exercise, resistance training, chronic stroke, attention, processing speed, executive function, working memory
MeSH terms
Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review