The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological Acceleration, Skill Transferability, and the Rise in Residual Inequality
Abstract
This paper provides a quantitative theory for the recent rise in residual wage inequality consistent with the empirical observation that a sizable part of this increase has a transitory nature, a feature that eludes standard models based on ex ante heterogeneity in ability. An acceleration in the rate of quality improvement of equipment, like the one observed from the early 1970s, increases the productivity/quality differentials across machines (jobs). In a frictional labor market, this force translates into higher wage dispersion even among ex ante equal workers. With vintage-human capital, the acceleration reduces workers' capacity to transfer skills from old to new machines, generating a rise in the cross-sectional variance of skills, and therefore of wages. Through calibration, the paper shows that this mechanism can account for 30 percent of the surge in residual inequality in the U. S. economy (or for most of its transitory component). Two key implications of the theory—faster within-job wage growth and larger wage losses upon displacement—find empirical support in the data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors
Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118323 · Cited by 4,793
Cited by
Technical change, inequality, and the labor market
Acemoglu, D. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.40.1.7 · Cited by 1,767
Inequality: Causes and Consequences
Neckerman, K. M., & Torche, F. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131755 · Cited by 498
Earnings Dynamics, Changing Job Skills, and STEM Careers*
Deming, D. J., & Noray, K. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa021 · Cited by 418
Parenting With Style: Altruism and Paternalism in Intergenerational Preference Transmission
Doepke, M., & Zilibotti, F. (2017) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta14634 · Cited by 348
Income uncertainty and household savings in China
Chamon, M., Liu, K., & Prasad, E. (2013) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.07.014 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Violante, G. L.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 297-338
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2041718256
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technological Acceleration, Skill Transferability, and the Rise in Residual Inequality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/003355302753399517
- The paper
- Violante, G. L. (2002). Technological Acceleration, Skill Transferability, and the Rise in Residual Inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.