The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electoral Systems and Public Spending
Open accessAbstract
We study the effects of electoral institutions on the size and composition of public expenditure in OECD and Latin American countries. We emphasize the distinction between purchases of goods and services, which are easier to target geographically, and transfers, which are easier to target across social groups. We present a theoretical model in which voters anticipating government policymaking under different electoral systems have an incentive to elect representatives more prone to transfer (public good) spending in proportional (majoritarian) systems. The model also predicts higher total primary spending in proportional (majoritarian) systems when the share of transfer spending is high (low). After defining rigorous measures of proportionality to be used in the empirical investigation, we find considerable support for our predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems
Cox, G. W. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174954 · Cited by 2,281
Cited by
Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510809 · Cited by 4,810
Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference
Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0199267669.001.0001 · Cited by 1,509
Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E. L. (. L., & Sacerdote, B. (2001) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2001.0014 · Cited by 936
Ethnic diversity and economic development
Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.01.002 · Cited by 712
Political institutions and policy choices: evidence from the United States
Besley, T. (2002) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.1920/wp.ifs.2002.0213 · Cited by 577
Metadata
- Authors
- Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Perotti, R., & Rostagno, M.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 609-657
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W3121515037
- Cited by
- 716
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 70.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electoral Systems and Public Spending. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/003355302753650346
- The paper
- Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Perotti, R., & Rostagno, M. (2002). Electoral Systems and Public Spending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753650346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.