The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finite-Sample Properties of Propensity-Score Matching and Weighting Estimators
Abstract
The finite-sample properties of matching and weighting estimators, often used for estimating average treatment effects, are analyzed. Potential and feasible precision gains relative to pair matching are examined. Local linear matching (with and without trimming), k-nearest-neighbor matching, and particularly the weighting estimators performed worst. Ridge matching, on the other hand, leads to an approximately 25% smaller MSE than does pair matching. In addition, ridge matching is least sensitive to the design choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?
A. Smith, J., & E. Todd, P. (2005) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · Cited by 3,176
Cited by
Hainmueller, J. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr025 · Cited by 6,026
Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5 · Cited by 4,926
Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?
A. Smith, J., & E. Todd, P. (2005) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · Cited by 3,176
Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects
Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2011) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/jbes.2009.07333 · Cited by 1,416
How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching
Black, D. A., & Smith, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.006 · Cited by 673
New evidence on the finite sample properties of propensity score reweighting and matching estimators
Busso, M., DiNardo, J., & McCrary, J. (2014) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00431 · Cited by 428
Reynolds, C. L., & DesJardins, S. L. (2009) · Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9628-0_2 · Cited by 104
Prinja, S., Nimesh, R., Gupta, A., Bahuguna, P., Gupta, M., & Thakur, J. S. (2017) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/tmi.12895 · Cited by 81
Assessing the impact of national antibiotic campaigns in Europe
Filippini, M., Ortiz, L. G. G., & Masiero, G. (2013) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-012-0404-9 · Cited by 55
Propensity Score Matching for Education Data: Worked Examples
Powell, M. G., Hull, D. M., & Beaujean, A. A. (2020) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2018.1541850 · Cited by 40
Specification tests for the propensity score
Sant’Anna, P. H. C., & Song, X. (2019) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.02.002 · Cited by 31
Do Internships Matter?: the Impact of Internship Participation on Employability
Choe, C., Kim, Y. B., & Choi, K. (2023) · The Singapore Economic Review · doi:10.1142/s0217590823500133 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Frölich, M.
- Venue
- Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-90
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9142
- OpenAlex
- W2127403366
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
