The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study
Open accessAbstract
The studies presented here use an adapted oddball paradigm to show evidence that representations of discrete phonological categories are available to the human auditory cortex. Brain activity was recorded using a 37-channel biomagnetometer while eight subjects listened passively to synthetic speech sounds. In the phonological condition, which contrasted stimuli from an acoustic /dæ/-/tæ/ continuum, a magnetic mismatch field (MMF) was elicited in a sequence of stimuli in which phonological categories occurred in a many-to-one ratio, but no acoustic many-to-one ratio was present. In order to isolate the contribution of phonological categories to the MMF responses, the acoustic parameter of voice onset time, which distinguished standard and deviant stimuli, was also varied within the standard and deviant categories. No MMF was elicited in the acoustic condition, in which the acoustic distribution of stimuli was identical to the first experiment, but the many-to-one distribution of phonological categories was removed. The design of these studies makes it possible to demonstrate the all-or-nothing property of phonological category membership. This approach contrasts with a number of previous studies of phonetic perception using the mismatch paradigm, which have demonstrated the graded property of enhanced acoustic discrimination at or near phonetic category boundaries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,937
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,674
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted
Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(78)90006-9 · Cited by 2,706
Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/307161a0 · Cited by 2,218
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.171.3968.303 · Cited by 2,154
Risto, N. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429487354 · Cited by 2,024
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 · Cited by 1,604
Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer
Klatt, D. H. (1980) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.383940 · Cited by 1,583
Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., & Gjedde, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5058.846 · Cited by 1,507
Cited by
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 · Cited by 2,644
The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 · Cited by 2,144
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.
Friederici, A. D. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2011 · Cited by 2,140
‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex
Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., & Winkler, I. (2001) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01790-2 · Cited by 832
Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Jobert, A., & Dehaene, S. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.039 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, C., Pellathy, T., Marantz, A., Yellin, E., Wexler, K., Poeppel, D., McGinnis, M., & Roberts, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1038-1055
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2147970825
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/08989290051137567
- The paper
- Phillips, C., Pellathy, T., Marantz, A., Yellin, E., Wexler, K., Poeppel, D., McGinnis, M., & Roberts, T. (2000). Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.