The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of Human Prefrontal Cortex to Delay Performance
Abstract
Neurological patients with focal lesions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and age-matched control subjects were tested on an auditory version of the delayed-match-to-sample task employing environmental sounds. Subjects had to indicate whether a cue (S1) and a subsequent target sound (S2) were identical. On some trials, S1 and S2 were separated by a silent period of 5 sec. On other trials, the 5-sec delay between S1 and S2 was filled with irrelevant tone pips that served as distractors. Behaviorally, frontal patients were impaired by the presence of distractors. Electrophysiologically, patients generated enhanced primary auditory cortex-evoked responses to the tone pips, supporting a failure in inhibitory control of sensory processing after prefrontal damage. Intrahemispheric reductions of neural activity generated in the auditory association cortex and additional intrahemispheric reductions of attention-related frontal activity were also observed in the prefrontal patients. Together, these findings suggest that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is crucial for gating distracting information as well as maintaining distributed intrahemispheric neural activity during auditory working memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks
Knight, R. T., Richard Staines, W., Swick, D., & Chao, L. L. (1999) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00004-9 · Cited by 498
Self-citation
Cited by
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196323 · Cited by 2,229
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
D'Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031 · Cited by 1,653
Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping
Bates, E., Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. F. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1050 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationError-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task
Menon, V., Adleman, N. E., White, C. D., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. (2001) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/1097-0193(200103)12:3<131::aid-hbm1010>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 1,045
Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension
Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Van Valin, R. D., Redfern, B. B., & Jaeger, J. J. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.002 · Cited by 1,035
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, L. L., & Knight, R. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-177
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2103739377
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of Human Prefrontal Cortex to Delay Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892998562636
- The paper
- Chao, L. L., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Contribution of Human Prefrontal Cortex to Delay Performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562636
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.