The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing Functional Connectivity Using a Network Likelihood Model of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity
Abstract
Analyzing the dependencies between spike trains is an important step in understanding how neurons work in concert to represent biological signals. Usually this is done for pairs of neurons at a time using correlation-based techniques. Chornoboy, Schramm, and Karr (1988) proposed maximum likelihood methods for the simultaneous analysis of multiple pair-wise interactions among an ensemble of neurons. One of these methods is an iterative, continuous-time estimation algorithm for a network likelihood model formulated in terms of multiplicative conditional intensity functions. We devised a discrete-time version of this algorithm that includes a new, efficient computational strategy, a principled method to compute starting values, and a principled stopping criterion. In an analysis of simulated neural spike trains from ensembles of interacting neurons, the algorithm recovered the correct connectivity matrices and interaction parameters. In the analysis of spike trains from an ensemble of rat hippocampal place cells, the algorithm identified a connectivity matrix and interaction parameters consistent with the pattern of conjoined firing predicted by the overlap of the neurons' spatial receptive fields. These results suggest that the network likelihood model can be an efficient tool for the analysis of ensemble spiking activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Geurts, M., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150485 · Cited by 19,186
Goodall, C. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488412 · Cited by 8,675
The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat
O'Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1 · Cited by 6,151
Linear and nonlinear programming.
(1986) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(86)90092-3 · Cited by 4,805
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B)
Fildes, R. (1993) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(93)90088-5 · Cited by 3,437
Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks
Mergenthaler, M. J., & Lehmann, E. L. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268531 · Cited by 3,329
Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep
Wilson, M. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8036517 · Cited by 3,118
Self-citationPhase relationship between hippocampal place units and the EEG theta rhythm
O'Keefe, J., & Recce, M. L. (1993) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.450030307 · Cited by 2,552
Dynamics of the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space
Wilson, M. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8351520 · Cited by 2,350
Self-citationFunctional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets
Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Liddle, P. F., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1993.4 · Cited by 1,978
Cited by
Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population
Pillow, J. W., Shlens, J., Paninski, L., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Chichilnisky, E. J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07140 · Cited by 1,311
The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference
Barnett, L., & Seth, A. K. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.018 · Cited by 1,044
Neuronal Mechanisms of Cortical Alpha Oscillations in Awake-Behaving Macaques
Bollimunta, A., Chen, Y., Schroeder, C. E., & Ding, M. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2699-08.2008 · Cited by 434
Correlations and Neuronal Population Information
Kohn, A., Coen-Cagli, R., Kanitscheider, I., & Pouget, A. (2016) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-013851 · Cited by 367
Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Nonparametric Adaptive Estimation for Spike Train Analysis
Reynaud-Bouret, P., Rivoirard, V., Grammont, F., & Tuleau-Malot, C. (2014) · The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/2190-8567-4-3 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Okatan, M., Wilson, M. A., & Brown, E. N.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1927-1961
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2172053542
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing Functional Connectivity Using a Network Likelihood Model of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/0899766054322973
- The paper
- Okatan, M., Wilson, M. A., & Brown, E. N. (2005). Analyzing Functional Connectivity Using a Network Likelihood Model of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity. Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/0899766054322973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
