The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Can a Neuron Learn with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity?
Abstract
Spiking neurons are very flexible computational modules, which can implement with different values of their adjustable synaptic parameters an enormous variety of different transformations F from input spike trains to output spike trains. We examine in this letter the question to what extent a spiking neuron with biologically realistic models for dynamic synapses can be taught via spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) to implement a given transformation F. We consider a supervised learning paradigm where during training, the output of the neuron is clamped to the target signal (teacher forcing). The well-known perceptron convergence theorem asserts the convergence of a simple supervised learning algorithm for drastically simplified neuron models (McCulloch-Pitts neurons). We show that in contrast to the perceptron convergence theorem, no theoretical guarantee can be given for the convergence of STDP with teacher forcing that holds for arbitrary input spike patterns. On the other hand, we prove that average case versions of the perceptron convergence theorem hold for STDP in the case of uncorrelated and correlated Poisson input spike trains and simple models for spiking neurons. For a wide class of cross-correlation functions of the input spike trains, the resulting necessary and sufficient condition can be formulated in terms of linear separability, analogously as the well-known condition of learnability by perceptrons. However, the linear separability criterion has to be applied here to the columns of the correlation matrix of the Poisson input. We demonstrate through extensive computer simulations that the theoretically predicted convergence of STDP with teacher forcing also holds for more realistic models for neurons, dynamic synapses, and more general input distributions. In addition, we show through computer simulations that these positive learning results hold not only for the common interpretation of STDP, where STDP changes the weights of synapses, but also for a more realistic interpretation suggested by experimental data where STDP modulates the initial release probability of dynamic synapses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast
Abbott, L. F., & Nelson, S. B. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81453 · Cited by 2,263 · cited 6×
“Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) has emerged in recent years as the experimentally most studied form of synaptic plasticity (see ( Abbott and Nelson, 2000; Fregnac, 2002; Gerstner and Kistler, 2002) for reviews).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDifferential signaling via the same axon of neocortical pyramidal neurons
Markram, H., Wang, Y., & Tsodyks, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.9.5323 · Cited by 1,102
Learning Input Correlations through Nonlinear Temporally Asymmetric Hebbian Plasticity
Gütig, R., Aharonov, R., Rotter, S., & Sompolinsky, H. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-09-03697.2003 · Cited by 401
Neuronal Dynamics of Predictive Coding
Mehta, M. R. (2001) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/107385840100700605 · Cited by 67
Cited by
Connectivity reflects coding: a model of voltage-based STDP with homeostasis
Clopath, C., Büsing, L., Vasilaki, E., & Gerstner, W. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2479 · Cited by 607
Phenomenological models of synaptic plasticity based on spike timing
Morrison, A., Diesmann, M., & Gerstner, W. (2008) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-008-0233-1 · Cited by 593
Ponulak, F., & Kasiński, A. (2010) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2009.11-08-901 · Cited by 573
Learning Real-World Stimuli in a Neural Network with Spike-Driven Synaptic Dynamics
Brader, J. M., Senn, W., & Fusi, S. (2007) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.11.2881 · Cited by 371
Spiking Neural Networks and online learning: An overview and perspectives
Lobo, J. L., Del Ser, J., Bifet, A., & Kasabov, N. (2020) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.004 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Legenstein, R., Naeger, C., & Maass, W.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2337-2382
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W1982580897
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Can a Neuron Learn with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/0899766054796888
- The paper
- Legenstein, R., Naeger, C., & Maass, W. (2005). What Can a Neuron Learn with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity? Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/0899766054796888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.