Dynamic stochastic synapses as computational units.
Abstract
In most neural network models, synapses are treated as static weights that change only with the slow time scales of learning. It is well known, however, that synapses are highly dynamic and show use-dependent plasticity over a wide range of time scales. Moreover, synaptic transmission is an inherently stochastic process: a spike arriving at a presynaptic terminal triggers the release of a vesicle of neurotransmitter from a release site with a probability that can be much less than one. We consider a simple model for dynamic stochastic synapses that can easily be integrated into common models for networks of integrate-and-fire neurons (spiking neurons). The parameters of this model have direct interpretations in terms of synaptic physiology. We investigate the consequences of the model for computing with individual spikes and demonstrate through rigorous theoretical results that the computational power of the network is increased through the use of dynamic synapses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The role of synapses as processing units of the human brain is reinforced by the results of computational simulation, which indicate that the computational power of a network is increased using dynamic synapses.
“The role of synapses as processing units of the human brain is reinforced by the results of computational simulation, which indicate that the computational power of a network is increased using dynamic synapses.”
From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Maass and Zador, 1999
Cites
Harris, K., & Stevens, J. (1989) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.09-08-02982.1989 · Cited by 1,073 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martins, N. R. B., Angelica, A., Chakravarthy, K., Svidinenko, Y., Boehm, F. J., Opris, I., Lebedev, M. A., Swan, M., Garan, S. A., Rosenfeld, J. V., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00112 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maass, W., & Zador, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 903-917
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2102365206
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- synaptic plasticity, spike-timing-dependent plasticity, integrate-and-fire neurons, spiking neural networks, synaptic transmission, vesicle release, spike-based computation
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Neurons, Stochastic Processes, Synapses, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review