Cited by 1,073Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Dendritic spines of CA 1 pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus: serial electron microscopy with reference to their biophysical characteristics

Open access
Harris, KM, Stevens, JK·1989·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Serial electron microscopy and 3-D reconstructions of dendritic spines from hippocampal area CA 1 dendrites were obtained to evaluate 2 questions about relationships between spine geometry and synaptic efficacy. First, under what biophysical conditions are the spine necks likely to reduce the magnitude of charge transferred from the synapses on the spine heads to the recipient dendrite? Simulation software provided by Charles Wilson (1984) was used to determine that if synaptic conductance is 1 nS or less, only 1% of the hippocampal spine necks are sufficiently thin and long to reduce charge transfer by more than 10%. If synaptic conductance approaches 5 nS, however, 33% of the hippocampal spine necks are sufficiently thin and long to reduce charge transfer by more than 10%. Second, is spine geometry associated with other anatomical indicators of synaptic efficacy, including the area of the postsynaptic density and the number of vesicles in the presynaptic axon? Reconstructed spines were graphically edited into head and neck compartments, and their dimensions were measured, the areas of the postsynaptic densities (PSD) were measured, and all of the vesicles in the presynaptic axonal varicosities were counted. The dimensions of the spine head were well correlated with the area of PSD and the number of vesicles in the presynaptic axonal varicosity. Spine neck diameter and length were not correlated with PSD area, head volume, or the number of vesicles. These results suggest that the dimensions of the spine head, but not the spine neck, reflect differences in synaptic efficacy. We suggest that the constricted necks of hippocampal dendritic spines might reduce diffusion of activated molecules to neighboring synapses, thereby attributing specificity to activated or potentiated synapses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.09-08-02982.1989

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The masking of membrane specializations is probably one of the reasons why many ultrastructural studies that used high concentrations of potassium ferrocyanide/ferricyanide (1.5-3.0%) provided no data on SS.

    “This is probably one of the reasons why many ultrastructural studies that utilized high concentrations of potassium ferrocyanide/ferricyanide (1.5–3.0%) provided no data on SS (e.g., Harris and Stevens, 1989; Hayworth et al., 2014; Yakoubi et al., 2019a; Yin et al., 2020; Gour et al., 2021; Phelps et al., 2021; Peddie et al., 2022; Turner et al., 2022).”

    From Unambiguous identification of asymmetric and symmetric synapses using volume electron microscopy (2024) · cites this paper as Harris and Stevens, 1989

    The Serial electron microscopy methods report that tissue from two animals was treated with 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide, supporting the citation as an example of a study using the stated concentration range. The paper does not say that this treatment masked membrane specializations or caused an absence of SS data; it instead discusses possible staining or fixation limitations in visualizing smooth endoplasmic reticulum. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Given that each spine receives only one synaptic input, the data indicate that the highest possible degree of freedom is available in synaptic connections in the dendrites, which has been assumed in the learning models of most neural network theories.

    “Given that each spine receives only one synaptic input13, our data indicate the highest possible degree of freedom is available in synaptic connections in the dendrites, which has been assumed in the learning models of most neural network theories17.”

    From Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons (2001) · cites this paper as [13]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The expression of AMPA receptors is controlled independently at the level of the individual spine.

    “This observation suggests that the expression of AMPA receptors is controlled independently at a level of the individual spine, consistent with the classical notion that a single spine may behave as an independent chemical compartment to regulate synaptic transmission13, 14.”

    From Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons (2001) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Serial electron microscopy section (p. 2983) proposes that constricted spine necks might limit diffusion to neighboring synapses, supporting the cited notion of a spine as a possible chemical compartment. The discussion of spine geometry and synaptic efficacy (page not specified in our copy) likewise treats compartmentation as a possibility. Neither passage establishes that AMPA-receptor expression is controlled independently at each spine. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Regions of glutamate sensitivity tended to be asymmetrically localized to one portion of a spine.

    “Regions of glutamate sensitivity tended to be asymmetrically localized to one portion of a spine (Figs. 3h and 4c–j), consistent with the predominant localization of AMPA receptors within PSDs with a diameter of 0.1 to 0.5μm13, 19, 20.”

    From Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons (2001) · cites this paper as [13]

    The citation follows the sentence’s PSD explanation, while the asymmetric glutamate-sensitivity observation is presented as the citing paper’s own finding. In “Relationships between hippocampal spine geometry and,” Harris and Stevens describe PSDs as occupying only a small portion of spine surface and suggest that larger PSDs contain more receptors. Our copy does not establish that the receptors are specifically AMPA receptors or give the stated 0.1–0.5 μm PSD diameter. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Syn1a-CFP puncta area correlated with pHuse area.

    “Syn1a-CFP puncta area calculated as a measure of bouton area, which correlated with pHuse area, as expected42.”

    From A trans-synaptic nanocolumn aligns neurotransmitter release to receptors (2016) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Serial electron microscopy section reports that postsynaptic density area was proportional to presynaptic axonal varicosity volume, supporting a general relationship between bouton size and synaptic size. It does not report Syn1a-CFP puncta, pHuse area, or a correlation between those two fluorescence measurements. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Harris, K. M., F. E. Jensen, and B. Tsao (1988) Ultrastructure, de- velopment, and plasticity of synapses in area CA1 of the rat hippo- campus: Extending our vision with serial electron microscopy and three dimensional analyses. Neurol. Neurobiol. (in press).
  2. Andersen, P., T. Blackstad, G. Hulleberg, J. Line Vaaland, and M. Andersen, P., T. Blackstad, G. Hulleberg, M. Trommald, and J. L. Vaaland (1988b) Dimensions ofdendritic spines ofrat dentate gran- Trommald (1988a) Changes in spine morphology associated with ule cells during long-term potentiation (LTP). Proc. Physiol. Sot. P.C. 50. long-term potentiation in rat dentate granule cells. Proc. Physiol. Sot. s.
  3. Diamond, J., E. G. Gray, and G. M. Yasargil (1970) The function of dendritic spines: An hypothesis. In Excitatory Synaptic Mechanisms, P. Andersen and J. Jensen, eds., pp. 2 13-222, Universitets Forlaget, Oslo.
  4. Meek, G. A. (1976) Practical Electron Microscopyfor Biologists, Wiley, New York.
  5. Rall, W. (1970) Cable properties of dendrites and effects of synaptic location. In Excitatory Synaptic Mechanisms, P. Andersen and J. K. S. Jensen, eds., pp. 175-l 87, Universitets Forlaget, Oslo.
  6. Rall, W. (1978) Dendritic spines and synaptic potency. In Studies in NeurophysioloRy, A. K. McIntyre and K. Porter, eds., pp. 203-209, Cambridge U.-P., Cambridge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, K., & Stevens, J.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1989-08-01
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
2982-2997
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2117664079
Cited by
1,073
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 42
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (NS21184)
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS21184, NS 20820)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD018655, P30HD-18655)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dendritic spines, CA1 pyramidal neurons, hippocampus, synaptic efficacy, postsynaptic density, synaptic vesicles, charge transfer, synaptic conductance, dendritic spine morphology, synaptic specificity
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Biophysics, Dendrites, Electric Conductivity, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Hippocampus, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Purkinje Cells, Rats, Inbred Strains, Synapses, Rats, Biophysical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review