The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy‐Wide Materials Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators
Abstract
Summary: Economy‐wide material flow analysis (MFA) and derived indicators have been developed to monitor and assess the metabolic performance of economies, that is, with respect to the internal economic flows and the exchange of materials with the environment and with other economies. Indicators such as direct material input (DMI) and direct material consumption (DMC) measure material use related to either production or consumption. Domestic hidden flows (HF) account for unused domestic extraction, and foreign HF represent the upstream primary resource requirements of the imports. DMI and domestic and foreign HF account for the total material requirement (TMR) of an economy. Subtracting the exports and their HF provides the total material consumption (TMC). DMI and TMR are used to measure the (de‐) coupling of resource use and economic growth, providing the basis for resource efficiency indicators. Accounting for TMR allows detection of shifts from domestic to foreign resource requirements. Net addition to stock (NAS) measures the physical growth of an economy. It indicates the distance from flow equilibrium of inputs and outputs that may be regarded as a necessary condition of a sustainable mature metabolism. We discuss the extent to which MFA‐based indicators can also be used to assess the environmental performance. For that purpose we consider different impacts of material flows, and different scales and perspectives of the analysis, and distinguish between turnover‐based indicators of generic environmental pressure and impact‐based indicators of specific environmental pressure. Indicators such as TMR and TMC are regarded as generic pressure indicators that may not be used to indicate specific environmental impacts. The TMR of industrial countries is discussed with respect to the question of whether volume and composition may be regarded as unsustainable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Human Dimensions of Geomorphological Work in Britain
Douglas, I., & Lawson, N. (2000) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819800569771 · Cited by 76
Cited by
Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: an evaluation and critical analysis
Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J., & Xue, B. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.005 · Cited by 911
Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Krausmann, F., Leon-Gruchalski, B., et al. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a · Cited by 909
Fischer‐Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Mayer, A., Bringezu, S., Moriguchi, Y., Schütz, H., Schandl, H., & Weisz, H. (2011) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x · Cited by 503
Self-citationResource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance
Franklin-Johnson, E., Figge, F., & Canning, L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.023 · Cited by 377
Defining and measuring urban sustainability: a review of indicators
Huang, L., Wu, J., & Yan, L. (2015) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0208-2 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Bringezu, S., Schütz, H., & Moll, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 43-64
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W2117018178
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy‐Wide Materials Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/108819803322564343
- The paper
- Bringezu, S., Schütz, H., & Moll, S. (2003). Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy‐Wide Materials Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819803322564343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.