Cited by 413Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchSustainable Industrial EcologyWaste Management and Environmental Impact

Cement Manufacture and the Environment. Part II: Environmental Challenges and Opportunities

van Oss, Hendrik G., Padovani, Amy C.·2003·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Construction materials account for a significant proportion of nonfuel materials flows throughout the industrialized world. Hydraulic (chiefly portland) cement, the binding agent in concrete and most mortars, is an important construction material. Portland cement is made primarily from finely ground clinker, a manufactured intermediate product that is composed predominantly of hydraulically active calcium silicate minerals formed through high‐temperature burning of limestone and other materials in a kiln. This process typically requires approximately 3 to 6 million Btu (3.2 to 6.3 GJ) of energy and 1.7 tons of raw materials (chiefly limestone) per ton (t) of clinker produced and is accompanied by significant emissions of, in particular, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), but also nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and particulates. The overall level of CO 2 output, about 1 ton/ton clinker, is almost equally contributed by the calcination of limestone and the combustion of fuels and makes the cement industry one of the top two manufacturing industry sources of this greenhouse gas. The enormous demand for cement and the large energy and raw material requirements of its manufacture allow the cement industry to consume a wide variety of waste raw materials and fuels and provide the industry with significant opportunities to symbiotically utilize large quantities of by‐products of other industries. This article, the second in a two‐part series, summarizes some of the environmental challenges and opportunities facing the cement manufacturing industry. In the companion article, the chemistry, technology, raw materials, and energy requirements of cement manufacture were summarized. Because of the size and scope of the U.S. cement industry, the article relies primarily on data and practices from the United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/108819803766729212

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Globally, appropriate management of land as part of the development or reconstruction of sites where concrete structures have been demolished or destroyed should be considered as a way of partly compensating for emissions associated with the loss of CO2 from firing carbonate raw materials (around 50% of the total CO2 emissions of a kiln).

    “Globally, appropriate management of land as part of the development or reconstruction of sites where concrete structures have been demolished or destroyed should be considered as a way of partly compensating for emissions associated with the loss of CO 2 from firing carbonate raw materials (around 50% of the total CO 2 emissions of a kiln).48”

    From Rapid Removal of Atmospheric CO2 by Urban Soils (2015) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Oss, H. G., & Padovani, A. C.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2003-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
93-126
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W1967173770
Cited by
413
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
FWCI
32.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Waste Management and Environmental Impact
Keywords
cement production, Portland cement, cement clinker, limestone calcination, CO2 emissions, greenhouse gases, waste raw materials, industrial symbiosis, energy consumption, building materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review