Cited by 98Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentInnovative Human-Technology InteractionLaw in Society and Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Legal Design as a Thing: A Theory of Change and a Set of Methods to Craft a Human-Centered Legal System

Hagan, Margaret·2020·Design Issues

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/desi_a_00600

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 4 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Owen Charles, 2006, Design Research Quarterly, 1, 16
  2. Owen Charles, 2006, BPM Strategies Magazine, The Business Process Management Institute
  3. Brunschwig Colette, 2014, Editions Weblaw, 899
  4. Fraser Véronique, 2016, Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 16, 303
  5. Quintanilla Victor, 2017, Penn State Law Review, 121, 745

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hagan, M.
Corresponding author
Hagan, Margaret
Venue
Design Issues
Published
2020-06
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
3-15
ISSN
  • 0747-9360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4790
OpenAlex
W3038045576
Cited by
83
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Design Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Law › Law in Society and Culture
Keywords
legal design, human-centered design, legal system design, theory of change, design methods, legal reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review