Cited by 6,935Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization AlgorithmsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications

Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms

Srinivas, N., Deb, Kalyanmoy·1994·Evolutionary Computation

Abstract

In trying to solve multiobjective optimization problems, many traditional methods scalarize the objective vector into a single objective. In those cases, the obtained solution is highly sensitive to the weight vector used in the scalarization process and demands that the user have knowledge about the underlying problem. Moreover, in solving multiobjective problems, designers may be interested in a set of Pareto-optimal points, instead of a single point. Since genetic algorithms (GAs) work with a population of points, it seems natural to use GAs in multiobjective optimization problems to capture a number of solutions simultaneously. Although a vector evaluated GA (VEGA) has been implemented by Schaffer and has been tried to solve a number of multiobjective problems, the algorithm seems to have bias toward some regions. In this paper, we investigate Goldberg's notion of nondominated sorting in GAs along with a niche and speciation method to find multiple Pareto-optimal points simultaneously. The proof-of-principle results obtained on three problems used by Schaffer and others suggest that the proposed method can be extended to higher dimensional and more difficult multiobjective problems. A number of suggestions for extension and application of the algorithm are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evolutionary algorithms such as Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-I) and Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D) can approximate the true Pareto Optimal solutions of multi-objective problems.

    “It has been shown that evolutionary algorithms such as Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-I) [73] and Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D) [74], can approximate the true PO solutions of multi-objective problems [70].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Srinivas, N., & Deb, K.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Venue
Evolutionary Computation
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
1994-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
221-248
ISSN
  • 1063-6560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9304
OpenAlex
W2116661285
Cited by
6,935
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 196 · 2025: 291 · 2024: 331 · 2023: 312 · 2022: 328 · 2021: 374 · 2020: 327 · 2019: 311 · 2018: 326 · 2017: 367 · 2016: 303 · 2015: 307 · 2014: 309 · 2013: 331 · 2012: 299
FWCI
11.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evolutionary Computation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
multi-objective optimization, non-dominated sorting, genetic algorithm, Pareto optimal solutions, scalarization, population-based optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review